Pollen accumulation on hawkmoths varies substantially among moth-pollinated flowers
Abstract
Using the pollen loads carried by floral visitors to infer their floral visitation behavior is a powerful technique to explore the foraging of wild pollinators. Interpreting these pollen records, however, requires assumptions about the underlying pollen dynamics. To compare visitor foraging across flower species, the most important assumption is that pollen is picked up and retained on the visitor at similar rates. Given differences in pollen presentation traits such as grain number or stickiness even among flowers with similar morphologies, however, the generality of this assumption is unclear. We investigated pollen accumulation on the hawkmoth Manduca sexta, testing the degree to which accumulation differed among flower species and how pollen stickiness affected this accumulation. In no-choice floral visitation assays to six plant species visited by long-tongued hawkmoths in the wild, M. sexta individuals were allowed to visit flowers 1, 2, or 5 times, after which the pollen on their proboscises was removed and counted. We found that the six plant species varied orders of magnitude in the number of pollen grains deposited on the moths, with some placing thousands of grains after a single visit and other placing none after five. Plant species with sticky pollen adhesion mechanisms placed more pollen on the moths and had relatively less pollen accumulation over successive visits than non-sticky plants. Intriguingly, moths carried fewer pollen grains after 5 visits than after 2 visits, suggesting that both sticky and non-sticky pollen was lost during foraging. Together, our results suggest that interpretation of pollen load data should be made cautiously, especially when comparing across plant species.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Tactile active sensing in insect-plant pollination
Tanvi Deora, Mahad A. Ahmed, … Bingni W. Brunton·bioRxiv·Jun 16, 2020
- The fate of pollen in two morphologically contrasting buzz-pollinated Solanum flowers
Christian Ary Vasquez-Castro, Elodie Morel, … Mario Vallejo‐Marín·Journal of Pollination EcologyPeer-reviewed·Sep 17, 2025
- Learning to handle flowers increases pollen collection benefits for bees but does not affect pollination success for plants
Maggie M. Mayberry, Katherine C. Naumer, … Avery L. Russell·Behavioral EcologyPeer-reviewed·Oct 1, 2024
- Revisiting Aristotle's observation on bees: High floral constancy is common among bees but it is shaped by the locally abundant flowering species
Saket Shrotri, Sukhraj Kaur, … Vinita Gowda·bioRxiv·Oct 28, 2024
- Adaptive generalization in pollinators: hawkmoths increase fitness to long-tubed flowers, but secondary pollinators remain important
Katherine E. Wenzell, Johnathan Y. Zhang, … Jeremie Benjamin Fant·Ecology and EvolutionPeer-reviewed·May 1, 2024
- Pollinator and flower morphology interact to influence pollen receipt
Ethan Newman, Allan G. Ellis, Bruce Anderson·bioRxiv·May 16, 2025