Egocentric value maps of the near-body environment
Rory John BufacchiiD, Richard SomervailiD, Aoife M. FitzpatrickiD, Y MurayamaiD, Nikos K. LogothetisiD, Roberto CaminitiiD, Gian Domenico IannettiiD
Abstract
Body-part centric response fields are pervasive: they are observed in single neurons, fMRI, EEG, and multiple behavioural measures. This prevalence across scales and measures makes them excellent candidates for studying systems-level neuroscience. Nonetheless, they remain poorly understood because we lack a unifying formal explanation of their origins and role in wider brain function. Here, we provide such explanation. We use reinforcement learning to analytically explain the existence of body-part centric receptive fields, also known as peripersonal field. We then simulate multiple experimental findings considered foundational in the peripersonal space literature. Our results demonstrate that peripersonal fields naturally arise from two simple and plausible assumptions about living agents: 1) they experience reward when they contact objects in the environment, and 2) they act to maximise reward. These simple assumptions are enough to explain empirical findings on stimulus kinematics, tool use, valence, and network-architecture. Our explanation provides further insight. First, it offers multiple empirically testable predictions. Second, it offers a formal description of the notion that the world-agent state is encoded in parieto-premotor cortices, using motor primitives: peripersonal fields provide building blocks that together create a short-term model of the world near the agent in terms of its future states; a successor representation. This short-term, close-range egocentric peripersonal map is analogous to the long-term, long-range allocentric spatial map of place and grid cells, which underlie locomotion and navigation to reach distant objects. Together, these allocentric and egocentric maps allow efficient interactions with a changing environment across multiple spatial and temporal scales. O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=149 SRC="FIGDIR/small/504456v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (68K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1c9d635org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@e4b1corg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@65390borg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1840160_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 9
- FWCI
- 4.54
- Field percentile
- top 5%
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- A model of egocentric to allocentric understanding in mammalian brains
Benigno Uría, Borja Ibarz, … Charles Blundell·bioRxiv·Nov 11, 2020
- How do egocentric boundary cells depend upon the coordinate system of environmental features?
Jennifer C. Robinson, Patrick A. LaChance, … Michael Erik Hasselmo·bioRxiv·Feb 3, 2025
- Rapid Recalibration of Peri-Personal Space; Psychophysical, Electrophysiological, and Neural Network Modeling Evidence
Jean‐Paul Noel, Tommaso Bertoni, … Andrea Serino·Cerebral CortexPeer-reviewed·Apr 4, 2020
- Composing egocentric and allocentric maps for flexible navigation
Daniel Shani, Peter Dayan·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Jan 23, 2026
- Distinct networks coupled with parietal cortex for spatial representations inside and outside the visual field
Bo Zhang, Fan Wang, … Yuji Naya·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Feb 26, 2022
- Exploration biases how forelimb reaches to a spatial target are learned
Alice C. Mosberger, Leslie J. Sibener, … Rui M. Costa·Cell ReportsPeer-reviewed·Mar 22, 2024