Characterization of the Interaction of Nanobubble Ultrasound Contrast Agents with Human Blood Components
M. B. Cooley, E. C. Abenojar, D. Wegierak, A. Sen Gupta, M. C. Kolios, A. A. Exner
Abstract
Nanoscale ultrasound contrast agents, or nanobubbles, are being explored in preclinical applications ranging from vascular and cardiac imaging to targeted drug delivery in cancer. These sub-micron particles are approximately 10x smaller than clinically available microbubbles. This allows them to effectively traverse compromised physiological barriers and circulate for extended periods of time. While various aspects of nanobubble behavior have been previously examined, their behavior in human whole blood has not yet been explored. Accordingly, herein we examined, for the first time, the short and long-term effects of blood components on nanobubble acoustic response. We observed differences in the kinetics of backscatter from nanobubble suspensions in whole blood compared to bubbles in phosphate buffered saline (PBS), plasma, or red blood cell solutions (RBCs). Specifically, after introducing nanobubbles to fresh human whole blood, signal enhancement gradually increased by 22.8 {+/-} 13.1% throughout our experiment, with peak intensity reached within 145 seconds. In contrast, nanobubbles in PBS had a stable signal with negligible change in intensity (-1.7 {+/-} 3.2%) over 8 minutes. Under the same conditions, microbubbles made with the same lipid formulation showed a -56.8 {+/-} 6.1% decrease in enhancement. Subsequent confocal, fluorescent, and scanning electron microscopy analysis revealed attachment of the nanobubbles to the surface of RBCs, suggesting that direct interactions, or hitchhiking, of nanobubbles on RBCs in the presence of plasma may be a possible mechanism for the observed effects. This phenomenon could be key to extending nanobubble circulation time and has broad implications in drug delivery, where RBC interaction with nanoparticles could be exploited to improve delivery efficiency.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Organism
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Nanobubbles are Non-Echogenic for Fundamental-Mode Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging
J. X. Myers, J. A. Navarro-Becerra, M. A. Borden·bioRxiv·Mar 25, 2022
- Nanobubble-Based Ultrasound Localization Microscopy through Interactive Adaptive Processing
Grigori Shapiro, Yarin Gershman, … Tali Ilovitsh·bioRxiv·Jul 17, 2026
- Intracellular Vesicle Entrapment of Nanobubble Ultrasound Contrast Agents Targeted to PSMA Promotes Prolonged Enhancement and Stability In Vivo and In Vitro
R. Perera, E. Abenojar, … A. Exner·bioRxiv·May 11, 2021
- Decorrelation Time Mapping as an Analysis Tool for Nanobubble-Based Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging
D. Wegierak, M. B. Cooley, … A. A. Exner·IEEE Transactions on Medical ImagingPeer-reviewed·Jun 1, 2024
- Bubble Trouble: Conquering Microbubble Limitations in Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging by Nature-Inspired Ultrastable Echogenic Nanobubbles
A. de Leon, R. Perera, … A. Exner·bioRxiv·May 9, 2019
- Truly tiny acoustic biomolecules for ultrasound imaging and therapy
Bill Ling, Bilge Gungoren, … Mikhail G. Shapiro·Advanced MaterialsPeer-reviewed·Feb 26, 2024