A Reinforcement Learning Model with Choice Traces for a Progressive Ratio Schedule
Keiko IharaiD, Yu ShikanoiD, Sae Kato, Sho YagishitaiD, Kenji F. TanakaiD, Norio TakataiD
Abstract
The progressive ratio (PR) lever-press task serves as a benchmark for assessing goal-oriented motivation. However, a well-recognized limitation of the PR task is that only a single data point, known as the breakpoint, is obtained from an entire session as a barometer of motivation. Because the breakpoint is defined as the final ratio of responses achieved in a PR session, variations in choice behavior during the PR task cannot be captured. We addressed this limitation by constructing four reinforcement learning models: a Simple Q- learning model, an Asymmetric model with two learning rates, a Perseverance model with choice traces, and a Perseverance model without learning. These models incorporated three behavioral choices: reinforced and non-reinforced lever presses and void magazine nosepokes (MNPs), because we noticed that mice performed frequent MNPs during PR tasks. The best model was the Perseverance model, which predicted a gradual reduction in amplitudes of reward prediction errors (RPEs) upon void MNPs. We confirmed the prediction experimentally with fiber photometry of extracellular dopamine (DA) dynamics in the ventral striatum of mice using a fluorescent protein (genetically encoded GPCR activation-based DA sensor: GRABDA2m). We verified application of the model by acute intraperitoneal injection of low-dose methamphetamine (METH) before a PR task, which increased the frequency of MNPs during the PR session without changing the breakpoint. The Perseverance model captured behavioral modulation as a result of increased initial action values, which are customarily set to zero and disregarded in reinforcement learning analysis. Our findings suggest that the Perseverance model reveals effects of psychoactive drugs on choice behaviors during PR tasks.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 3
- FWCI
- 0.52
- Field percentile
- top 44%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Comparison of progressive hold and progressive response schedules of reinforcement.
C. S. Alvarez-Sekely, A. L. Toscano-Zapien, … D. Velaquez-Martinez·bioRxiv·Aug 17, 2022
- The Role of State Uncertainty in the Dynamics of Dopamine
John G. Mikhael, HyungGoo R. Kim, … Samuel Joseph Gershman·Current BiologyPeer-reviewed·Feb 2, 2022
- Dopamine regulates decision thresholds in human reinforcement learning.
Karima Chakroun, Antonius Wiehler, … Jan Peters·bioRxiv·Sep 29, 2022
- Conserved reward-mediated, reinforcement-learning mechanisms in Pavlovian and instrumental tasks
N. Moin Afshar, F. Cinotti, … S. M. Groman·bioRxiv·Jun 12, 2022
- Reward prediction-errors weighted by cue salience produces addictive behaviors in simulations, with asymmetrical learning and steeper delay discounting
Shivam Kalhan, Marta Isabel Garrido, … A. David Redish·Neural NetworksPeer-reviewed·Sep 25, 2023
- Temporally distinct reward and action prediction error signals during value learning and habit formation
Yuhao Wang, Lauren M. Burgeno, … Mark E. Walton·bioRxiv·Aug 24, 2026