CARDBiomedBench: A Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Model Performance in Biomedical Research
Owen BianchiiD, Maya WilleyiD, Chelsea X. AlvaradoiD, Benjamin P. DanekiD, Marzieh KhaniiD, Nicole KuznetsoviD, Anant DaduiD, Syed Muhammad Tahir Shah, Mathew J. KoretskyiD, Mary B. MakariousiD, Cory A. WelleriD, Kristin S. LevineiD, Sungwon Kim, Paige JarreauiD, Dan VitaleiD, Elise MarsaniD, Hirotaka IwakiiD, Hampton Leonard, Sara Bandrés‐CigaiD, Andrew SingletoniD, Mike A. NallsiD, Shekoofeh Mokhtari, Daniel KhashabiiD, Faraz FaghriiD
Abstract
BackgroundsBiomedical research requires sophisticated understanding and reasoning across multiple specializations. While large language models (LLMs) show promise in scientific applications, their capability to safely and accurately support complex biomedical research remains uncertain. MethodsWe present CARDBiomedBench, a novel question-and-answer benchmark for evaluating LLMs in biomedical research. For our pilot implementation, we focus on neurodegenerative diseases (NDDs), a domain requiring integration of genetic, molecular, and clinical knowledge. The benchmark combines expert-annotated question-answer (Q/A) pairs with semi-automated data augmentation, drawing from authoritative public resources including drug development data, genome-wide association studies (GWAS), and Summary-data based Mendelian Randomization (SMR) analyses. We evaluated seven private and open-source LLMs across ten biological categories and nine reasoning skills, using novel metrics to assess both response quality and safety. ResultsOur benchmark comprises over 68,000 Q/A pairs, enabling robust evaluation of LLM performance. Current state-of-the-art models show significant limitations: models like Claude-3.5-Sonnet demonstrates excessive caution (Response Quality Rate: 25% [95% CI: 25% {+/-} 1], Safety Rate: 76% {+/-} 1), while others like ChatGPT-4o exhibits both poor accuracy and unsafe behavior (Response Quality Rate: 37% {+/-} 1, Safety Rate: 31% {+/-} 1). These findings reveal fundamental gaps in LLMs ability to handle complex biomedical information. ConclusionCARDBiomedBench establishes a rigorous standard for assessing LLM capabilities in biomedical research. Our pilot evaluation in the NDD domain reveals critical limitations in current models ability to safely and accurately process complex scientific information. Future iterations will expand to other biomedical domains, supporting the development of more reliable AI systems for accelerating scientific discovery.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 6
- FWCI
- 3.77
- Field percentile
- top 7%
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Federated Knowledge Retrieval Elevates Large Language Model Performance on Biomedical Benchmarks
Janet Joy, Andrew I. Su·GigaSciencePeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2026
- BiomniBench: Process-level Evaluation of LLM Agents for Real-world Biomedical Research
Yuanhao Qu, Yingzhou Lu, … Kexin Huang·bioRxiv·May 18, 2026
- A benchmark for large language models in bioinformatics
Varuni Sarwal, Gaia Andreoletti, … Serghei Mangul·bioRxiv·Dec 19, 2023
- MedMisBench: Measuring Epistemic Resilience of LLMs Under Misleading Medical Context
Hongjian Zhou, Xinyu Zou, … David A. Clifton·bioRxiv·Jun 10, 2026
- Optimizing biomedical information retrieval with a keyword frequency-driven Prompt Enhancement Strategy
Wasim Aftab, Zivkos Apostolou, … Tobias Straub·BMC BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Aug 27, 2024
- A Comprehensive Benchmark Study on Biomedical Text Generation and Mining with ChatGPT
Qijie Chen, Haotong Sun, … Hongming Chen·bioRxiv·Apr 19, 2023