bioRxivScientific Communication & Education
A Systems Change Framework for Evaluating Academic Equity and Inclusion in an Ecology & Evolution Graduate Program
Abstract
While academia is moving forward in terms of diversifying recruitment of undergraduate and graduate students, diverse representation is still not found across the academic hierarchy. At the graduate level, new discussions are emerging around efforts to improve the experiences of women and underrepresented minorities through inclusive graduate programming. Inclusive graduate programs are that which actively center and prioritize support for diverse experiences, identities, career goals, and perspectives, from recruitment through graduation. Establishing regular and rigorous evaluation of equity and inclusion efforts and needs is a critical component of this work. This is recognized by funding agencies that increasingly require reporting on inclusion efforts; here we suggest use of a systems change framework for these evaluations. A systems change approach emphasizes three levels: explicit change (e.g. policies), semi-explicit change (e.g. power dynamics), and implicit change (e.g. biases). We use the Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior (EEB) PhD Program at the University of Texas at Austin in an exercise to (1) identify areas of concern regarding inclusive programming voiced by graduate students, (2) categorize efforts to address these concerns, and (3) integrating and evaluating which areas of the systems change framework show the greatest progress or potential for progress. We argue this framework is particularly useful for academic systems as they are complex, composed of variable individuals, and must address diverse stakeholder needs.
- research focus: ecology & biodiversity
- research focus: benchmarking
- research focus: database / resource
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- The Clash of Academic Hierarchy and Inclusive Leadership: Evolution of Leadership in a Nationwide Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Initiative
D. Codding, B. B. Goldberg·bioRxiv·Mar 12, 2023
- Enabling Success Through Transformative Practices in STEM: The Effects of Applying an Anti-Deficit Framework to Diversity and Equity Programming
D. S. Duncan, J. L. Jackson, … A. Teherani·bioRxiv·Jun 22, 2023
- UCLA's Competitive Edge Program Provides an Advantage to STEM Doctoral Students from Historically Excluded and Underrepresented Groups
C. A. Del Carpio, D. E. Azurdia·bioRxiv·Sep 8, 2023
- A strong start for sustained success: inclusivity through a national group mentorship program for first-year graduate students
Sergio R. Labra, Valerie A. Tornini, … Robert W. Fernandez·bioRxiv·Mar 15, 2026
- Policy should change to improve invited speaker diversity and reflect trainee diversity
A. K. Hagan, R. M. Pollet, J. Libertucci·bioRxiv·Oct 4, 2019
- Lessons and recommendations from three decades as an NSF REU Site: A call for systems-based assessment
A. L. McDevitt, M. V. Patel, A. Ellison·bioRxiv·Apr 21, 2019