Benchmarking Oxford Nanopore read assemblers for high-quality molluscan genomes
Jin SuniD, Runsheng LiiD, Chong CheniD, Julia D. SigwartiD, Kevin M. KocotiD
Abstract
Choosing the optimum assembly approach is essential to achieving a high-quality genome assembly suitable for comparative and evolutionary genomic investigations. Significant recent progress in long-read sequencing technologies such as PacBio and Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) also brought about a large variety of assemblers. Although these have been extensively tested on model species such as Homo sapiens and Drosophila melanogaster, such benchmarking has not been done in Mollusca which lacks widely adopted model species. Molluscan genomes are notoriously rich in repeats and are often highly heterozygous, making their assembly challenging. Here, we benchmarked 10 assemblers based on ONT raw reads from two published molluscan genomes of differing properties, the gastropod Chrysomallon squamiferum (356.6Mb, 1.59% heterozygosity) and the bivalve Mytilus coruscus (1593Mb, 1.94% heterozygosity). By optimising the assembly pipeline, we greatly improved both genomes from previously published versions. Our results suggested that 40-50X of ONT reads are sufficient for high-quality genomes, with Flye being the recommended assembler for compact and less heterozygous genomes exemplified by C. squamiferum, while NextDenovo excelled for more repetitive and heterozygous molluscan genomes exemplified by M. coruscus. A phylogenomic analysis utilising the two updated genomes with other 32 published high-quality lophotrochozoan genomes resulted in maximum support across all nodes, and we show that improved genome quality also leads to more complete matrices for phylogenomic inferences. Our benchmarking will ensure the efficiency in future assemblies for molluscs and perhaps also other marine phyla with few genomes available.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 50
- FWCI
- 2.27
- Field percentile
- top 10%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Evaluation of hybrid and non-hybrid methods for de novo assembly of nanopore reads
Ivan Sovic, Kresimir Krizanovic, … Mile Sikic·bioRxiv·Nov 13, 2015
- Assembly methods for nanopore-based metagenomic sequencing: a comparative study
Adriel Latorre‐Pérez, Pascual Villalba‐Bermell, … Cristina Vilanova·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Aug 12, 2020
- Optimizing experimental design for genome sequencing and assembly with Oxford Nanopore Technologies
John M. Sutton, Joshua D. Millwood, … Janna L. Fierst·GigabytePeer-reviewed·Jul 13, 2021
- High-quality metagenome assembly from nanopore reads with nanoMDBG
Gaëtan Benoit, Robert S James, … Christopher Quince·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Mar 6, 2026
- Unlocking the full potential of Oxford Nanopore reads with NOVOLoci
Nicolas Dierckxsens, Michael J. Mansfield, … Joris Robert Vermeesch·bioRxiv·Aug 8, 2025
- When do longer reads matter? A benchmark of long read de novo assembly tools for eukaryotic genomes
Bianca-Maria Cosma, Ramin Shirali Hossein Zade, … Thomas Abeel·bioRxiv·Jan 30, 2023