Sign in
NeuroscienceeLife
Peer-reviewed journal article

Punishment insensitivity emerges from impaired contingency detection, not aversion insensitivity or reward dominance

Philip Jean-Richard-dit-BresseliD, Cassandra MaiD, Laura A BradfieldiD, Simon KillcrossiD, Gavan P. McNallyiD

Abstract

Our behaviour is shaped by its consequences - we seek rewards and avoid harm. It has been reported that individuals vary markedly in their avoidance of detrimental consequences, i.e. in their sensitivity to punishment. The underpinnings of this variability are poorly understood; they may be driven by differences in aversion sensitivity, motivation for reward, and/or instrumental control. We examined these hypotheses by applying several analysis strategies to the behaviour of rats (n = 48; 18 female) trained in a task permitting concurrent assessment of punishment, reward-seeking, and Pavlovian fear. We show that punishment insensitivity is a unique phenotype, unrelated to differences in reward-seeking and Pavlovian fear, and due to a failure of instrumental control. Subjects insensitive to punishment are afraid of aversive events, they are simply unable to change their behaviour to avoid them.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISJean-Richar '21Varas '26Solinas '23Dorfman '19Marshall '21Jones '24
88% semantic matchNeuroscience
Philip Jean-Richard-dit-Bressel, Jessica C. Lee, Shi Xian Liew+3 more·eLife·Jun 4, 2021· 37 citations