bioRxivNeurosciencePreprint
Human Visual Search Follows Suboptimal Bayesian Strategy Revealed by a Spatiotemporal Computational Model
Abstract
Humans perform sequences of eye movements to search for a target in complex environment, but the efficiency of human search strategy is still controversial. Previous studies showed that humans can optimally integrate information across fixations and determine the next fixation location. However, their models ignored the temporal control of eye movement, ignored the limited human memory capacity, and the model prediction did not agree with details of human eye movement metrics well. Here, we measured the temporal course of human visibility map and recorded the eye movements of human subjects performing a visual search task. We further built a continuous-time eye movement model which considered saccadic inaccuracy, saccadic bias, and memory constraints in the visual system. This model agreed with many spatial and temporal properties of human eye movements, and showed several similar statistical dependencies between successive eye movements. In addition, our model also predicted that the human saccade decision is shaped by a memory capacity of around 8 recent fixations. These results suggest that human visual search strategy is not strictly optimal in the sense of fully utilizing the visibility map, but instead tries to balance between search performance and the costs to perform the task. Author SummaryDuring visual search, how do humans determine when and where to make eye movement is an important unsolved issue. Previous studies suggested that human can optimally use the visibility map to determine fixation locations, but we found that such model didnt agree with details of human eye movement metrics because it ignored several realistic biological limitations of human brain functions, and couldnt explain the temporal control of eye movements. Instead, we showed that considering the temporal course of visual processing and several constrains of the visual system could greatly improve the prediction on the spatiotemporal properties of human eye movement while only slightly affected the search performance in terms of median fixation numbers. Therefore, humans may not use the visibility map in a strictly optimal sense, but tried to balance between search performance and the costs to perform the task.
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Trade-off between search costs and accuracy in oculomotor and manual search tasks
Ilja Wagner, Jan Tünnermann, … Alexander C. Schütz·Journal of NeurophysiologyPeer-reviewed·Mar 26, 2025
- Optimal planning of eye movements
D. Hoppe, C. A. Rothkopf·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Jan 15, 2019
- The influence of movement-related costs when searching to act and acting to search
Joshua B. Moskowitz, Sarah A. Berger, … John Randall Flanagan·bioRxiv·Mar 1, 2022
- A Mathematical Model of Exploration and Exploitation in Natural Scene Viewing
Noa Malem-Shinitski, Manfred Opper, … Ralf Engbert·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Dec 14, 2020
- Confidence in predicted position error explains saccadic decisions during pursuit
Jonathan Coutinho, Philippe Lefèvre, Gunnar Blohm·Journal of NeurophysiologyPeer-reviewed·Dec 23, 2020
- High-fidelity but hypometric spatial localization of afterimages across saccades
Richard Schweitzer, Thomas Seel, … Martin Rolfs·Science AdvancesPeer-reviewed·Mar 13, 2026