The influence of movement-related costs when searching to act and acting to search
Joshua B. MoskowitziD, Sarah A. Berger, Monica S. CastelhanoiD, Jason P. GallivaniD, John Randall FlanaganiD
Abstract
Real world search behaviour often involves limb movements, either during search or following search. Here we investigated whether movement-related costs influence search behaviour in two kinds of search tasks. In our visual search tasks, participants made saccades to find a target object among distractors and then moved a cursor, controlled by the handle of a robotic manipulandum, to the target. In our manual search tasks, participants moved the cursor to perform the search, placing it onto objects to reveal their identity as either a target or a distractor. Across experiments, we manipulated either the effort or time costs associated with movement such that these costs varied across the search space. We varied effort by applying different resistive forces to the handle and we varied time costs by altering the speed of the cursor. Our analysis of cursor and eye movements during manual and visual search, respectively, showed that effort influenced manual search but did not influence visual search. In contrast, time costs influenced both visual and manual search. Our results demonstrate that, in addition to perceptual and cognitive factors, movement-related costs can also influence search behaviour. Public Significance StatementMany of the tasks we perform on a daily basis involve searching for targets. Numerous studies have investigated perceptual and cognitive factors that influence decisions about where to search. However, few studies have examined how search is influenced by movement-related costs associated with manual search (e.g., opening drawers to find a corkscrew) or acting on an object once it has been located (e.g., reaching for a particular bottle of wine once it has been spied in a rack). We show that movement effort and time costs associated with manual search, and time costs associated with moving after visual search, can influence decision-making about where to search over time.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papersReproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Trade-off between search costs and accuracy in oculomotor and manual search tasks
Ilja Wagner, Jan Tünnermann, … Alexander C. Schütz·Journal of NeurophysiologyPeer-reviewed·Mar 26, 2025
- Humans anticipate the consequences of motor control demands when making perceptual decisions between actions
Élise Leroy, Éric Koun, David Thura·bioRxiv·Nov 14, 2024
- Dissociating the impact of movement time and energy costs on decision-making and action initiation in humans
Clara Saleri, Amélie J. Reynaud, David Thura·Frontiers in Human NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Nov 1, 2021
- Human Visual Search Follows Suboptimal Bayesian Strategy Revealed by a Spatiotemporal Computational Model
Yunhui Zhou, Yuguo Yu·bioRxiv·Feb 11, 2020
- Motor "laziness" constrains fixation selection in real-world tasks
Charlie S. Burlingham, Naveen Sendhilnathan, … Michael J. Proulx·Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesPeer-reviewed·Mar 12, 2024
- Effort Drives Saccade Selection
Damian Koevoet, Laura Van Zantwijk, … Christoph Strauch·eLifePeer-reviewed·Apr 7, 2025