Sign in
Developmental BiologyGenes Brain & Behavior
Peer-reviewed journal article

Maternal care of heterozygous Dopamine Receptor D4 knockout mice: Differential susceptibility to early-life rearing conditions

Jelle KnopiD, Marinus H. van IJzendoorniD, Marian J. Bakermans‐KranenburgiD, Marian JoëlsiD, Rixt van der VeeniD

Abstract

The differential susceptibility hypothesis proposes that individuals who are more susceptible to the negative effects of adverse rearing conditions may also benefit more from enriched environments. Evidence derived from human experiments suggests the lower efficacy dopamine receptor D4 (DRD4) 7-repeat as a main factor in exhibiting these for better and for worse characteristics. However, human studies lack the genetic and environmental control offered by animal experiments, complicating assessment of causal relations. To study differential susceptibility in an animal model, we exposed Drd4+/- mice and control litter mates to a limited nesting/bedding (LN), standard nesting (SN) or communal nesting (CN) rearing environment from postnatal day (P) 2-14. Puberty onset was examined from P24-P36 and adult females were assessed on maternal care towards their own offspring. In both males and females, LN reared mice showed a delay in puberty onset that was partly mediated by a reduction in body weight at weaning, irrespective of Drd4 genotype. During adulthood, LN reared females exhibited characteristics of poor maternal care, whereas dams reared in CN environments showed lower rates of unpredictability towards their own offspring. Differential susceptibility was observed only for licking/grooming levels of female offspring towards their litter; LN reared Drd4+/- mice exhibited the lowest and CN reared Drd4+/- mice the highest levels of licking/grooming. These results indicate that both genetic and early-environmental factors play an important role in shaping maternal care of the offspring for better and for worse.

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers
Citations
15
FWCI
2.46
Field percentile
top 12%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISLauby '19Reis '26Gallo '25Bray '26Seraphin '26Anderson '26
71% semantic matchNeuroscience