bioRxivNeurosciencePreprint
Quick, Don't Move!: Wh-Movement and Wh-In-Situ Structures in Rapid Parallel Reading - EEG studies in English, Urdu, and Mandarin Chinese
Dustin Alfonso Chacón, Donald G. DunaganiD, Jill McLendoniD, Hareem Khokhar, Zahin Hoque
Abstract
A fundamental question in the cognitive neuroscience of language is how grammatical representations are reflected in the organization and activity of the brain. This is challenging in part because superficial differences between languages, e.g., word order, exert different demands on the memory systems that process these structures. Here, we present an electroencephalography (EEG) study to investigate the brains responses to wh-constructions in English, Urdu, and Mandarin Chinese. In addition to the different word orders, writing systems, and morphological typologies of the 3 languages, these languages diverge with regard to how wh-constructions are formed: English requires filler-gap dependencies for wh-objects, whereas Urdu and Mandarin Chinese do not. We use a rapid parallel reading task, in which short sentences are displayed in parallel for 200ms to mitigate the different demands placed on memory systems. We show that neural responses distinguish wh-object constructions from their controls in midline anterior (Urdu, Mandarin Chinese) and right posterior sensors (English, Mandarin Chinese), from 200-400ms (English, Mandarin Chinese) and 500-800ms (English, Urdu). Although there is no detectable uniform, language-invariant response to wh-constructions across languages, there are a number of shared features in the evoked response between any pair of languages, i.e., wh-in-situ constructions generate an evoked response in midline anterior sensors. Moreover, behavioral evidence shows a robust cross-language cost of processing wh-object constructions, regardless of their surface form. This demonstrates that readers of diverse languages can process some grammatical information in a short 200ms fixation, and that the RPVP methodology may enable new ways of linking cognitive neuroscience of language to comparative syntax, i.e., the systematic description of similarities and differences between grammatical structures.
- organism: human
- assay: electronic health records
- research focus: benchmarking
- approach: experimental assay
- Citations
- 2
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Evaluating the timecourses of morpho-orthographic, lexical, and grammatical processing following rapid parallel visual presentation: an EEG investigation in English.
Donald G. Dunagan, Tyson Jordan, … Dustin Alfonso Chacón·bioRxiv·Apr 10, 2024
- Analyzing Differences in Processing Nouns and Verbs in the Human Brain using Combined EEG and MEG Measurements
Nikola Kölbl, Nadia Müller-Voggel, … Achim Schilling·bioRxiv·Dec 4, 2024
- Native language leaves distinctive traces in brain connections
Tomás Goucha, Alfred Anwander, … Angela Dorkas Friederici·bioRxiv·Jul 30, 2022
- MEG correlates of empty subjects in Japanese control and raising constructions
Koki Yamaguchi, Emi Yamada, … Shinri Ohta·bioRxiv·Jan 9, 2026
- Comparing serial and parallel language input: Shared neural representations with distinct encoding strengths
Simone Krogh, Liina Pylkkänen A·bioRxiv·Sep 24, 2026
- The same ultra-rapid parallel brain dynamics underpin the production and perception of speech.
Amie Fairs, Amandine Michelas, … Kristof Strijkers·Cerebral Cortex CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2021