BMC GenomicsGenomicsPeer-reviewed journal article
Neural network modeling of differential binding between wild-type and mutant CTCF reveals putative binding preferences for zinc fingers 1-2
Abstract
BackgroundMany transcription factors (TFs), such as multi zinc-finger (ZF) TFs, have multiple DNA binding domains (DBDs) with multiple components, and deciphering the DNA binding motifs of individual components is a major challenge. One example of such a TF is CCCTC-binding factor (CTCF), a TF with eleven ZFs that plays a variety of roles in transcriptional regulation, most notably anchoring DNA loops. Previous studies found that CTCF zinc fingers (ZFs) 3-7 bind CTCFs core motif and ZFs 9-11 bind a specific upstream motif, but the motifs of ZFs 1-2 have yet to be identified. ResultsWe developed a new approach to identifying the binding motifs of individual DBDs of a TF through analyzing chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing (ChIP-seq) experiments in which a single DBD is mutated: we train a deep convolutional neural network to predict whether wild-type TF binding sites are preserved in the mutant TF dataset and interpret the model. We applied this approach to mouse CTCF ChIP-seq data and, in addition to identifying the known binding preferences of CTCF ZFs 3-11, we identified a GAG binding motif for ZF1 and a weak ATT binding motif for ZF2. We analyzed other CTCF datasets to provide additional evidence that ZFs 1-2 interact with the motifs we identified, and we found that the presence of the motif for ZF1 is associated with Ctcf peak strength. ConclusionsOur approach can be applied to any TF for which in vivo binding data from both the wild-type and mutated versions of the TF are available, and our findings provide an unprecedently comprehensive understanding of the binding preferences of CTCFs DBDs.
- organism: mouse
- assay: ChIP-seq
- research focus: differential expression
- research focus: gene regulatory network inference
- approach: deep learning
- Citations
- 10
- FWCI
- 0.90
- Field percentile
- top 31%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Quantitative analysis of ZFY and CTCF reveals dependent recognition of tandem zinc finger proteins.
Zheng Zuo, Timothy Billings, … Gary D. Stormo·Nucleic Acids ResearchPeer-reviewed·Mar 14, 2023
- On the prediction of DNA-binding preferences of C2H2-ZF domains using structural models: application on human CTCF.
Alberto Meseguer, Filip Årman, … Baldomero Oliva·NAR Genomics and BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Jul 1, 2020
- DNA sequence quantitatively encodes CTCF-binding affinity at genome scale
Zihang Yin, Yefan Wang, … Ya Guo·bioRxiv·Jan 5, 2026
- Base-resolution models of transcription factor binding reveal soft motif syntax
Žiga Avsec, Melanie Weilert, … Julia Zeitlinger·Nature GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Feb 18, 2021
- Deep neural networks identify context-specific determinants of transcription factor binding affinity
An Zheng, Michael Lamkin, … Melissa Gymrek·bioRxiv·Feb 26, 2020
- Using attentive gated neural networks to quantify the impact of non-coding variants on transcription factor binding affinity
Neel A Patel, Haimeng Bai, William S. Bush·bioRxiv·Jul 30, 2021