Brain activity of professional investors signals future stock performance
Leonard D. van BrusseliD, Maarten A.S. BoksemiD, Roeland C. Dietvorst, Ale SmidtsiD
Abstract
A major aspiration of investors is to better forecast stock performance. Interestingly, emerging neuroforecasting research suggests that brain activity associated with anticipatory reward relates to market behavior and population-wide preferences, including stock price dynamics. In this study we extend these findings to professional investors processing comprehensive real-world information on stock investment options while making predictions of long-term stock performance. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), we sampled investors neural responses to investment cases and assessed whether these responses relate to future performance on the stock market. We find that our sample of investors could not successfully predict future market performance of the investment cases, confirming that stated preferences do not predict the market. Stock metrics of the investment cases were not predictive of future stock performance either. However, as investors processed case information, nucleus accumbens (NAcc) activity was higher for investment cases that ended up overperforming in the market. These findings remained robust, even when controlling for stock metrics and investors predictions made in the scanner. Cross-validated prediction analysis indicated that NAcc activity could significantly predict future stock performance out-of-sample above chance. Our findings resonate with recent neuroforecasting studies and suggest that brain activity of professional investors may help in forecasting future stock performance. Significance StatementThe investors dream of forecasting the stock market is typically considered to be just that: An unrealistic aspiration. However, we find that forecasting stock performance may in fact not be completely unattainable. Results of our neuroimaging experiment reveal that professional investors fail to accurately predict long-term stock performance. However, while processing complex information pertaining to investment cases, brain activity in a region associated with reward anticipation was increased for stocks that would end up overperforming in the future market. Remarkably, this effect held after controlling for the stock information presented in the investment cases. Our findings add to recent work in neuroforecasting, demonstrating that market behavior can be forecasted by brain activity of a small sample, here of professional investors.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 8
- FWCI
- 2.59
- Field percentile
- top 11%
- Organism
- Assay
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- From Retrospective to Prospective: Integrated Value Representation in Frontal Cortex for Predictive Choice Behavior
Kosuke Hamaguchi, Hiromi Takahashi-Aoki, Dai Watanabe·bioRxiv·Dec 27, 2021
- Predictive feedback, early sensory representations and fast responses to predicted stimuli depend on NMDA receptors
Sounak Mohanta, Mohsen Afrasiabi, … Yuri B. Saalmann·Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Nov 3, 2021
- How predictability and individual alpha frequency shape memory: insights from an event-related potential investigation
Sophie Jano, Alex Chatburn, … Ina Bornkessel‐Schlesewsky·Neurobiology of Learning and MemoryPeer-reviewed·Nov 19, 2024
- Neural and computational evidence for a predictive learning account of the testing effect
Haopeng Chen, Pieter Verbeke, … Tom Verguts·Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesPeer-reviewed·Aug 8, 2025
- The value of what’s to come: neural mechanisms coupling prediction error and reward anticipation
Kiyohito Iigaya, Tobias U. Hauser, … Raymond J. Dolan·bioRxiv·Jul 5, 2019
- Hippocampal-neocortical interactions sharpen over time for predictive actions
Nicholas C. Hindy, Emily W. Avery, Nicholas B. Turk‐Browne·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Sep 5, 2019