Division of labor during biofilm matrix production
A. Dragos, H. T. Kiesewalter, M. Martin, C.-Y. Hsu, R. Hartmann, T. Wechsler, C. Eriksen, S. Brix Pedersen, K. Drescher, N. Stanley-Wall, R. Kummerli, A. T. Kovacs
Abstract
Organisms as simple as bacteria can engage in complex collective actions, such as group motility and fruiting body formation. Some of these actions involve a division of labor, where phenotypically specialized clonal subpopulations, or genetically distinct lineages cooperate with each other by performing complementary tasks. Here, we combine experimental and computational approaches to investigate potential benefits arising from division of labor during biofilm matrix production. We show that both phenotypic and genetic strategies for a division of labor can promote collective biofilm formation in the soil bacterium Bacillus subtilis. In this species, biofilm matrix consists of two major components; EPS and TasA. We observed that clonal groups of B. subtilis phenotypically segregate into three subpopulations composed of matrix non-producers, EPS-producers, and generalists, which produce both EPS and TasA. This incomplete phenotypic specialization was outperformed by a genetic division of labor, where two mutants, engineered as specialists, complemented each other by exchanging EPS and TasA. The relative fitness of the two mutants displayed a negative frequency dependence both in vitro and on plant roots, with strain frequency reaching a stable equilibrium at 30% TasA-producers, corresponding exactly to the population composition where group productivity is maximized. Using individual-based modelling, we show that asymmetries in strain ratio can arise due to differences in the relative benefits that matrix compounds generate for the collective; and that genetic division of labor can be favored when it breaks metabolic constraints associated with the simultaneous production of two matrix components.\n\nHighlights- matrix components EPS and TasA are costly public goods in B. subtilis biofilms\n\n- genetic division of labor using {Delta}eps and {Delta}tasA fosters maximal biofilm productivity\n\n- {Delta}eps and {Delta}tasA cooperation is evolutionary stable in laboratory and ecological systems\n\n- costly metabolic coupling of public goods favors genetic division of labor
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Organism
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Privatization of biofilm matrix in structurally heterogeneous biofilms
S. B. Otto, M. Martin, … A. T. Kovacs·bioRxiv·Jul 7, 2020
- Kin discrimination modifies fitness, spatial segregation and matrix sharing between strains with low relatedness in Bacillus subtilis biofilms
M. Boljesic, B. Kraigher, … I. Mandic-Mulec·bioRxiv·Sep 24, 2021
- Systematic microscopical analysis reveals obligate synergy between extracellular matrix components during Bacillus subtilis colony biofilm development
M. Porter, F. A. Davidson, … N. Stanley-Wall·bioRxiv·Jun 16, 2022
- Evolution of exploitative interactions during diversification in Bacillus subtilis biofilms
A. Dragos, N. Lakshmanan, … A. T. Kovacs·bioRxiv·Nov 6, 2017
- Three-dimensional biofilm growth supports a mutualism involving matrix and nutrient sharing
H. A. Arjes, L. A. Willis, … K. Huang·bioRxiv·Oct 26, 2020
- Cheaters shape the evolution of phenotypic heterogeneity in Bacillus subtilis biofilms
M. Martin, A. Dragos, … A. T. Kovacs·bioRxiv·Feb 14, 2020