Nectar non-protein amino acids (NPAAs) do not change nectar palatability but enhance learning and memory in honey bees
D. Carlesso, S. Smargiassi, E. Pasquini, G. Bertelli, D. Baracchi
Abstract
Floral nectar is a pivotal element of the intimate relationship between plants and pollinators and its chemical composition is likely to have been shaped by strong selective pressures. Nectars are composed of a plethora of nutritionally valuable compounds but also hundreds of secondary metabolites (SMs) whose ecological role is still not completely understood. Here we performed a set of behavioural experiments to study whether five ubiquitous nectar non-protein amino acids (NPAAs: {beta}-alanine, GABA, citrulline, ornithine and taurine) interact with gustation, feeding preference, and learning and memory in the pollinator Apis mellifera. We showed that harnessed foragers were unable to discriminate NPAAs from water when only accessing antennal chemo-tactile information and that freely moving bees did not exhibit innate feeding preferences for NPAA-laced sucrose solutions. Also, dietary consumption of NPAAs did not alter food consumption or longevity in caged bees over 10 days. Taken together our data suggest that ecologically relevant concentrations of NPAAs did not alter nectar palatability to bees. Olfactory conditioning assays showed that honey bees were more likely to learn a scent when it signalled a sucrose reward containing either {beta}-alanine or GABA, and that GABA also enhanced specific memory retention. Conversely, when ingested two hours prior to conditioning, GABA, {beta}-alanine, and taurine weakened bees acquisition performances but not specific memory retention, which was enhanced in the case of {beta}-alanine and taurine. Neither citrulline nor ornithine affected learning and memory. Our study suggests that NPAAs in nectars may represent a cooperative strategy adopted by plants to attract beneficial pollinators, while simultaneously enhancing pollen transfer among conspecific flowers. Future work should validate these results in more ecological scenarios and extend the study to as many nectar SMs as possible, alone and in combination, as well as to other species of pollinators.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Organism
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Amino acid and carbohydrate tradeoffs by honey bee nectar foragers and their implications for plant-pollinator interactions
Harmen P. Hendriksma, Karmi L. Oxman, Sharoni Shafir·Journal of Insect PhysiologyPeer-reviewed·Oct 1, 2014
- Do pollinators play a role in shaping the essential amino acids found in nectar?
Rachel H. Parkinson, Eileen F. Power, … Geraldine A. Wright·New PhytologistPeer-reviewed·Jan 2, 2025
- Foraging task specialization in honey bees (Apis mellifera): the contribution of floral rewards on the learning performance of pollen and nectar foragers
Emilia Moreno, Andrés Arenas·Journal of Experimental BiologyPeer-reviewed·Jun 14, 2024
- Bumblebees learn to use peripheral taste to predict the presence of nectar in flowers
Michael J. M. Harrap, Rachel H. Parkinson, … Geraldine A. Wright·Journal of Experimental BiologyPeer-reviewed·Sep 17, 2025
- Gustatory sensitivity to amino acids in bumblebees
Sergio Rossoni, Rachel H. Parkinson, … Elizabeth Nicholls·Royal Society Open SciencePeer-reviewed·May 1, 2025
- Salt sweetens the deal: bumble bees prefer sodium-enriched nectar when its sugar concentration is low
Amanda Vieira da Silva, Avery L. Russell·bioRxiv·Sep 24, 2026