henhaobio
Sign in

eLifeNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article

Catecholaminergic neuromodulation and selective attention jointly shape perceptual decision-making

Stijn Adriaan NuiteniD, Jan Willem de GeeiD, Jasper Brian ZantvoordiD, Johannes J. FahrenfortiD, Simon van GaaliD

PDFDOIPreprint

Abstract

Perceptual decisions about sensory input are influenced by fluctuations in ongoing neural activity, most prominently driven by attention and neuromodulator systems. It is currently unknown if neuromodulator activity and attention differentially modulate perceptual decision-making and/or whether neuromodulatory systems in fact control attentional processes. To investigate the effects of two distinct neuromodulatory systems and spatial attention on perceptual decisions, we pharmacologically elevated cholinergic (through donepezil) and catecholaminergic (through atomoxetine) levels in humans performing a visuo-spatial attention task, while we measured electroencephalography (EEG). Both attention and catecholaminergic enhancement improved decision-making at the behavioral and algorithmic level, as reflected in increased perceptual sensitivity and the modulation of the drift rate parameter derived from drift diffusion modeling. Univariate analyses of EEG data time-locked to the attentional cue, the target stimulus, and the motor response, further revealed that attention and catecholaminergic enhancement both modulated pre-stimulus cortical excitability, cue- and stimulus-evoked sensory activity as well as parietal evidence accumulation signals. Interestingly, we observed both similar, unique, and interactive effects of attention and catecholaminergic neuromodulation on these behavioral, algorithmic, and neural markers of the decision-making process. Thereby, this study reveals an intricate relationship between attentional and catecholaminergic systems and advances our understanding about how these systems jointly shape various stages of perceptual decision-making.

Citations
1
FWCI
0.15
Field percentile
47th percentile

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISLoughnane '19Gee '25Pfeffer '18Ghosh '22Rangelov '20Robson '26
81% semantic matchNeuroscience
Gerard M. Loughnane, Méadhbh B. Brosnan, Jessica J.M. Barnes+4 more·Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience·Mar 18, 2019· 24 citations