NatureNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
The organization of intracortical connections by layer and cell class in the mouse brain
Julie A. HarrisiD, Ştefan MihalaşiD, Karla E. HirokawaiD, Jennifer D. WhiteselliD, Hannah ChoiiD, Amy BernardiD, Phillip BohniD, Shiella CaldejoniD, Linzy Casal, Andrew ChoiD, Aaron Feiner, David H. FengiD, Nathalie Gaudreault, Charles R. GerfeniD, Nile Graddis, Peter A. GroblewskiiD, Alex M. HenryiD, Anh HoiD, Robert Howard, Joseph E. KnoxiD, Leonard Kuan, Xiuli KuangiD, Jérôme A. LecoqiD, Phil LesnariD, Yaoyao LiiD, , Hongkui ZengiD
Abstract
The mammalian cortex is a laminar structure composed of many cell types densely interconnected in complex ways. Recent systematic efforts to map the mouse mesoscale connectome provide comprehensive projection data on interareal connections, but not at the level of specific cell classes or layers within cortical areas. We present here a significant expansion of the Allen Mouse Brain Connectivity Atlas, with [~]1,000 new axonal projection mapping experiments across nearly all isocortical areas in 49 Cre driver lines. Using 13 lines selective for cortical layer-specific projection neuron classes, we identify the differential contribution of each layer/class to the overall intracortical connectivity patterns. We find layer 5 (L5) projection neurons account for essentially all intracortical outputs. L2/3, L4, and L6 neurons contact a subset of the L5 cortical targets. We also describe the most common axon lamination patterns in cortical targets. Most patterns are consistent with previous anatomical rules used to determine hierarchical position between cortical areas (feedforward, feedback), with notable exceptions. While diverse target lamination patterns arise from every source layer/class, L2/3 and L4 neurons are primarily associated with feedforward type projection patterns and L6 with feedback. L5 has both feedforward and feedback projection patterns. Finally, network analyses revealed a modular organization of the intracortical connectome. By labeling interareal and intermodule connections as feedforward or feedback, we present an integrated view of the intracortical connectome as a hierarchical network.
- organism: mouse
- assay: spatial transcriptomics
- research focus: cell type annotation
- approach: experimental assay
- Citations
- 784
- FWCI
- 39.67
- Field percentile
- top 1%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Analysis of ipsilateral corticocortical connectivity in the mouse brain
Akiya Watakabe, Junya Hirokawa·Brain Structure and FunctionPeer-reviewed·Jul 9, 2018
- Individual cortical neurons innervating large proportions of the neocortical areas in the MouseLight database
Szilvia Szeier, Emanuel Svensson, … Henrik Jörntell·bioRxiv·Oct 22, 2025
- Cell-type-specific inhibitory circuitry from a connectomic census of mouse visual cortex
Casey M Schneider-Mizell, Ágnes L. Bodor, … Nuno Maçarico da Costa·bioRxiv·Jan 23, 2023
- The Mouse Cortical Interareal Network Reveals Well Defined Connectivity Profiles and an Ultra Dense Cortical Graph
Răzvan Gămănuț, Henry Kennedy, … Andreas Burkhalter·NeuronPeer-reviewed·Feb 1, 2018
- Layer 6 corticocortical neurons are a major route for intra and interhemispheric feedback
Simon Weiler, Manuel Teichert, Troy W. Margrie·bioRxiv·May 1, 2024
- Laminar-specific cortico-cortical loops in mouse visual cortex
Hedi Young, Beatriz Belbut, … Leopoldo Petreanu·eLifePeer-reviewed·Feb 1, 2021