Longitudinal trajectories of brain age in young individuals at familial risk of mood disorder
Laura de NooijiD, Mathew A. HarrisiD, Emma L. HawkinsiD, Toni‐Kim ClarkeiD, Xueyi SheniD, Stella W. Y. ChaniD, Tim B. ZiermansiD, Andrew Mark McIntoshiD, Heather Clare WhalleyiD
Abstract
BackgroundAccelerated biological ageing has been proposed as a mechanism underlying mood disorder, but has been predominantly studied cross-sectionally in adult populations. It remains unclear whether differential ageing/maturation trajectories emerge earlier in life, in particular during the neurodevelopmental period of adolescence, and whether they are associated with onset of mood disorder and/or presence of familial risk. MethodsParticipants were young individuals (16-25 years) from the prospective longitudinal Scottish Bipolar Family Study (SBFS) with and without family history of mood disorder. All were well at time of recruitment. Implementing a structural MRI-based brain age prediction model, individual maturational trajectories were captured by the difference between predicted brain age and chronological age (brain-PAD) at baseline and two-year follow-up. Based on clinical assessment at follow-up, individuals were categorised into three groups: (i) controls who remained well (C-well, n=94), (ii) high familial risk who remained well (HR-well, n=73) and (iii) high familial risk who developed a mood disorder (HR-MD, n=38). ResultsResults showed no differences in brain-PAD between groups at baseline or follow-up. However, we found negative trajectories of brain-PAD for HR-MD versus C-well ({beta}= -0.68 years, p<.001) and versus HR-well ({beta}= -0.38 years, p=.01), and for HR-well versus C-well ({beta}= -0.30 years, p=.03). ConclusionsThese findings suggest that within young individuals, onset of mood disorder and familial risk may be associated with a deceleration in brain maturation trajectory. However, without significantly differential status of brain maturation at follow-up, extended longitudinal research will need to show whether this marks the emergence of maturational lag.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 12
- FWCI
- 1.40
- Field percentile
- top 19%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Brain Aging in Major Depressive Disorder: Results from the ENIGMA Major Depressive Disorder working group
Laura K. M. Han, Richard Dinga, … Janice M. Fullerton·Molecular PsychiatryPeer-reviewed·May 18, 2020
- Lifestyle, Early-life, and Genetic Health Risk Factors Underlying the Brain Age Gap: A Mega-Analysis Across 3,934 Individuals from the ENIGMA MDD Consortium
Laura K. M. Han, Yara Jo Toenders, … Lianne Schmaal·bioRxiv·May 9, 2025
- Brain-predicted age associates with psychopathology dimensions in youth
Vanessa Cropley, Ye Tian, … Andrew Zalesky·Biological Psychiatry Cognitive Neuroscience and NeuroimagingPeer-reviewed·Aug 1, 2020
- Adolescent brain-age differences between profiles based on suicidal ideation, distress and wellbeing
Maddison Crethar, Laura K. M. Han, … Amanda Boyes·bioRxiv·Aug 5, 2026
- Regional brain age deviations reveal divergent developmental pathways in youth
Anthony Gagnon, Marie A. Brunet, … Larissa Takser·Biological PsychiatryPeer-reviewed·Mar 1, 2026
- Multidimensional brain-age prediction reveals altered brain developmental trajectory in psychiatric disorders
Xin Niu, Alexei Taylor, … Fengqing Zhang·Cerebral CortexPeer-reviewed·Dec 29, 2021