bioRxivNeurosciencePreprint
Similar processing of novelty in rat dorsal and intermediate CA1 despite differences in spatial tuning
Shang Lin Tommy LeeiD, Ryan TrohaiD, Jinah Yoon, Aditi Anam, Kori CitriniD, Qingli Hu, Miriam Katz, Mitchel Kuperstein, Divya SubramanianiD, David Katz, Kavya Katugam, Megan Pattoli, Stephanie Vu, Ian H. StevensoniD, Etan J. Markus
Abstract
Elucidating the fundamental neural mechanisms of hippocampal information processing is necessary for understanding memory formation and related brain disorders. Differences in hippocampal genetics, anatomy, and connectivity across the longitudinal axis suggest functional heterogeneity in this structure. The dorsal pole is suggested to be primarily involved in spatial processing, whereas the ventral pole is implicated in emotional processing. Connectivity and genetic studies show this functional segregation is more prominent near their respective poles and weaker toward the intermediate region. The current study compares the firing properties of CA1 cells in the dorsal and intermediate regions of the hippocampus during spatial or social/odor novelty. We measured basic spatial properties, firing rate response, and remapping to the spatial re-configuration of a linear track or the social/odor presentation of a novel male conspecific, female bedding, or coyote urine. Behaviorally, the average rat exhibited slower maze running latencies during the novel spatial manipulation and spent more time adjacent to the chamber containing the novel social/odor stimulus. As previously shown, dorsal cells had fewer, smaller place fields, and higher spatial information content than intermediate cells in the hippocampus. Despite the differences in place field characteristics, cells in both regions responded similarly to spatial and social/odor manipulations. Taken together, these data support the differentiation of some functions, together with an overlap of other functions progressing along the longitudinal axis, which may facilitate the integration of information throughout the hippocampus.
- organism: rat
- assay: electronic health records
- research focus: cell type annotation
- research focus: clustering
- research focus: differential expression
- research focus: spatial domain detection
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 1
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Dynamic representation of space in the hippocampus: spatial novelty detection and consolidation in CA1 and CA2
Guncha Bhasin·bioRxiv·Aug 19, 2021
- Behaviour-driven Arc expression is greater in dorsal than ventral CA1 regardless of task or sex differences.
J. Quinn Lee, Rebecca McHugh, … Robert J. McDonald·Behavioural Brain ResearchPeer-reviewed·Feb 8, 2022
- The Intermediate CA1 and CA3 Subfields of the Hippocampus Differentially Encode Social Recognition
Benjamin Dykstra, Aidan Lin, … Malavika Murugan·bioRxiv·Oct 27, 2025
- Distinct place cell dynamics in CA1 and CA3 encode experience in new contexts
Can Dong, Antoine D. Madar, Mark E. J. Sheffield·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·May 20, 2021
- Effects of novelty and temporal distance on post-experience reactivation of hippocampal place cells encoding multiple environments
Taiki Yokoi, Yu Shikano, … Takuya Sasaki·bioRxiv·Dec 17, 2023
- The ventral CA2 region of the hippocampus and its differential contributions to social memory and social aggression
Lara M. Boyle, Wanhui Sheng, … Steven A. Siegelbaum·Cell ReportsPeer-reviewed·May 1, 2025