bioRxivBioinformaticsPreprint
proDA: Probabilistic Dropout Analysis for Identifying Differentially Abundant Proteins in Label-Free Mass Spectrometry
Abstract
Protein mass spectrometry with label-free quantification (LFQ) is widely used for quantitative proteomics studies. Nevertheless, well-principled statistical inference procedures are still lacking, and most practitioners adopt methods from transcriptomics. These, however, cannot properly treat the principal complication of label-free proteomics, namely many non-randomly missing values. We present proDA, a method to perform statistical tests for differential abundance of proteins. It models missing values in an intensity-dependent probabilistic manner. proDA is based on linear models and thus suitable for complex experimental designs, and boosts statistical power for small sample sizes by using variance moderation. We show that the currently widely used methods based on ad hoc imputation schemes can report excessive false positives, and that proDA not only overcomes this serious issue but also offers high sensitivity. Thus, proDA fills a crucial gap in the toolbox of quantitative proteomics.
Abstract summary
Claude Opus 5.5 · xhigh effort · 2 Nov 2026 · from the abstract · CC BY-ND 4.0
proDA models intensity-dependent missing values probabilistically within variance-moderated linear models to test differential protein abundance in label-free mass spectrometry without the false positives of ad hoc imputation.
Label-free quantification (LFQ) proteomics suffers from abundant non-randomly missing values that transcriptomics-derived methods and ad hoc imputation schemes fail to handle properly, leading to excessive false positives. proDA directly models intensity-dependent dropout probabilistically within variance-moderated linear models for complex experimental designs and small sample sizes.
Key results
ShownproDA controls false positives while maintaining high sensitivity for differential protein abundance testing compared with widely used ad hoc imputation methods.
Qualitative comparison in the abstract showing that ad hoc imputation schemes report excessive false positives whereas proDA overcomes this issue with high sensitivity; specific numerical metrics are not given in the abstract. · Abstract
Methods, data and reproducibility
Formulated a linear-model-based differential abundance testing framework (proDA) that models missing values via an intensity-dependent probabilistic dropout model and applies variance moderation to increase statistical power in small sample sizes.
- Methods & tools
- proDA
Limitations (1)
- Benchmark datasets, sample sizes, and quantitative false-positive or sensitivity metrics are not reported in the abstract. · noted in this summary
Read this if you analyze label-free quantification mass spectrometry proteomics data and want differential abundance testing that accounts for non-random missing values without imputation.
- Citations
- 66
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Quantification and differential analysis of mass spectrometry proteomics data with probabilistic recovery of information from missing values
Mengbo Li, Simon A. Cobbold, Gordon K. Smyth·bioRxiv·Apr 28, 2025
- Missing values are informative in label-free shotgun proteomics data: estimating the detection probability curve
Mengbo Li, Gordon K. Smyth·BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Apr 17, 2023
- Accurate label-free quantification by directLFQ to compare unlimited numbers of proteomes
Constantin Ammar, Julia Patricia Schessner, … Matthias Mann·Molecular & Cellular ProteomicsPeer-reviewed·May 22, 2023
- Imputation of label-free quantitative mass spectrometry-based proteomics data using self-supervised deep learning
Henry Emanuel Webel, Lili Niu, … Simon Rasmussen·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Jun 26, 2024
- IonQuant enables accurate and sensitive label-free quantification with FDR-controlled match-between-runs
Fengchao Yu, Sarah E. Haynes, Alexey I. Nesvizhskii·Molecular & Cellular ProteomicsPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2021
- prolfqua: A Comprehensive R-package for Proteomics Differential Expression Analysis
Witold Wolski, Paolo Nanni, … Christian Panse·Journal of Proteome ResearchPeer-reviewed·Mar 20, 2023