henhaobio
Sign in

bioRxivBioinformaticsPreprint

proDA: Probabilistic Dropout Analysis for Identifying Differentially Abundant Proteins in Label-Free Mass Spectrometry

Constantin Ahlmann-EltzeiD, Simon AndersiD

PDFDOI

Abstract

Protein mass spectrometry with label-free quantification (LFQ) is widely used for quantitative proteomics studies. Nevertheless, well-principled statistical inference procedures are still lacking, and most practitioners adopt methods from transcriptomics. These, however, cannot properly treat the principal complication of label-free proteomics, namely many non-randomly missing values. We present proDA, a method to perform statistical tests for differential abundance of proteins. It models missing values in an intensity-dependent probabilistic manner. proDA is based on linear models and thus suitable for complex experimental designs, and boosts statistical power for small sample sizes by using variance moderation. We show that the currently widely used methods based on ad hoc imputation schemes can report excessive false positives, and that proDA not only overcomes this serious issue but also offers high sensitivity. Thus, proDA fills a crucial gap in the toolbox of quantitative proteomics.

Abstract summary

Claude Opus 5.5 · xhigh effort · 2 Nov 2026 · from the abstract · CC BY-ND 4.0

proDA models intensity-dependent missing values probabilistically within variance-moderated linear models to test differential protein abundance in label-free mass spectrometry without the false positives of ad hoc imputation.

Label-free quantification (LFQ) proteomics suffers from abundant non-randomly missing values that transcriptomics-derived methods and ad hoc imputation schemes fail to handle properly, leading to excessive false positives. proDA directly models intensity-dependent dropout probabilistically within variance-moderated linear models for complex experimental designs and small sample sizes.

Key results

  1. ShownproDA controls false positives while maintaining high sensitivity for differential protein abundance testing compared with widely used ad hoc imputation methods.

    Qualitative comparison in the abstract showing that ad hoc imputation schemes report excessive false positives whereas proDA overcomes this issue with high sensitivity; specific numerical metrics are not given in the abstract. · Abstract

Methods, data and reproducibility

Formulated a linear-model-based differential abundance testing framework (proDA) that models missing values via an intensity-dependent probabilistic dropout model and applies variance moderation to increase statistical power in small sample sizes.

Methods & tools
proDA
Limitations (1)
  • Benchmark datasets, sample sizes, and quantitative false-positive or sensitivity metrics are not reported in the abstract. · noted in this summary

Read this if you analyze label-free quantification mass spectrometry proteomics data and want differential abundance testing that accounts for non-random missing values without imputation.

Citations
66

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISLi '25Li '23Ammar '23Webel '24Yu '21Wolski '23
72% semantic matchBioinformatics
Mengbo Li, Simon A. Cobbold, Gordon K. Smyth·bioRxiv·Apr 28, 2025· 12 citations