A computational pipeline to determine lobular electric field distribution during cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation
Abstract
ObjectiveCerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation (ctDCS) is challenging due to the complexity of the cerebellar structure. Therefore, our objective is to develop a freely available computational pipeline to perform cerebellar atlas-based electric field analysis using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) guided subject-specific head modeling. MethodsWe present a freely available computational pipeline to determine subject-specific lobular electric field distribution during ctDCS. The computational pipeline can isolate subject-specific cerebellar lobules based on a spatially unbiased atlas (SUIT) for the cerebellum, and then calculates the lobular electric field distribution during ctDCS. The computational pipeline was tested in a case study using a subject-specific head model as well as using a Colin 27 Average Brain. The 5cmx5cm anode was placed 3 cm lateral to inion, and the same sized cathode was placed on the contralateral supraorbital area (called Manto montage) and buccinators muscle (called Celnik montage). A 4x1 HD-ctDCS electrode montage was also implemented for a comparison using analysis of variance (ANOVA). ResultsEta-squared effect size after three-way ANOVA for electric field strength was 0.05 for lobule, 0.00 for montage, 0.04 for head model, 0.01 for lobule*montage interaction, 0.01 for lobule* head model interaction, and 0.00 for montage*head model interaction in case of Enorm. Here, the electric field strength of both the Celnik and the Manto montages affected the lobules Crus II, VIIb, VIII, IX of the targeted cerebellar hemispheres while Manto montage had more bilateral effect. The HD-ctDCS montage primarily affected the lobules Crus I, Crus II, VIIb of the targeted cerebellar hemisphere. Our freely available computational modeling approach to analyze subject-specific lobular electric field distribution during ctDCS provided an insight into healthy human anodal ctDCS results
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 3
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Lobule-specific dosage considerations for cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation during healthy aging - a computational modeling study using age-specific MRI templates
Zeynab Rezaee, Anirban Dutta·Neuromodulation Technology at the Neural InterfacePeer-reviewed·Jan 29, 2020
- The impact of brain lesions on tDCS-induced electric field magnitude
Ainslie Johnstone, Catharina Zich, … Sven Bestmann·bioRxiv·Mar 19, 2021
- Towards the identification and optimization of the "dose-response" relationship of transcranial direct current stimulation
Ricardo Salvador, Maria Chiara Biagi, … Giulio Ruffini·bioRxiv·Jan 22, 2022
- Functional near-infrared spectroscopy in conjunction with electroencephalography of cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation responses in the latent neurovascular coupling space a chronic stroke study
Zeynab Rezaee, Shashi Ranjan, … Anirban Dutta·bioRxiv·May 24, 2020
- Polarity-dependent modulation of sensory circuits by cerebellar tDCS: local and distant effects
Carlos Andrés Sánchez-León, Isabel Cordones, … Javier Márquez‐Ruiz·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Jul 9, 2026
- Harmonizing the stimulation dose of focal tDCS across target sites
Axel Thielscher, Dayana Hayek, … Daria Antonenko·bioRxiv·Jan 10, 2026