Polarity-dependent modulation of sensory circuits by cerebellar tDCS: local and distant effects
Carlos Andrés Sánchez-LeóniD, Isabel CordonesiD, Alba Jiménez-DíaziD, Guy Chéron, Javier F. MedinaiD, Javier Márquez‐RuiziD
Abstract
Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation (Cb-tDCS) is a promising tool for non-invasive modulation of cerebellar function and is under investigation for treating cerebellum-related disorders. However, its local and remote effects on sensory processing remain poorly understood. We investigated the immediate and long-term effects of Cb-tDCS on sensory-evoked responses in the cerebellum and primary somatosensory cortex (S1) of awake mice. Sensory-evoked potentials (SEPs) were recorded in Crus I/II and S1 during and after short (15 s) or long (20 min) sessions of anodal or cathodal Cb-tDCS. In addition, vGLUT1 and GAD65-67 immunoreactivity were quantified, and spectral changes in local field potentials were assessed. Anodal and cathodal Cb-tDCS respectively induced an immediate increase and decrease in the trigeminal component in Crus I/II but no aftereffects were observed 20 min post-stimulation. In S1, Cb-tDCS resulted in polarity and intensity-dependent modulation of the N1 component during stimulation, which was opposite to the changes induced in Crus I/II, as well as a polarity-dependent modulation after stimulation. In addition, anodal Cb-tDCS was associated with reduced GAD65-67 immunoreactivity in S1, whereas vGLUT1 remained unchanged. While power spectrum analysis revealed no changes in Crus I/II, Cb-tDCS induced polarity-dependent post-stimulation changes in S1 spectral power, with higher values after cathodal stimulation. These findings show that Cb-tDCS differentially modulates sensory processing in cerebellar and cortical circuits. While cerebellar effects are mainly transient, stimulation induces longer-lasting changes in the remote cortical area investigated, S1. This underscores the need to consider both local and distant network effects when applying Cb-tDCS in translational and clinical settings.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.77
- Field percentile
- top 8%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Immediate and long-term effects of transcranial direct-current stimulation in the mouse primary somatosensory cortex
Carlos Andrés Sánchez-León, Isabel Cordones, … Javier Márquez‐Ruiz·bioRxiv·Jul 2, 2020
- Somatodendritic orientation determines tDCS-induced neuromodulation of Purkinje cell activity in awake mice.
Carlos Andrés Sánchez-León, Guillermo Sánchez-Garrido Campos, … Javier Márquez‐Ruiz·eLifePeer-reviewed·Apr 14, 2025
- The polarity specific nature of single session high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation to the cerebellum and prefrontal cortex on motor and non-motor task performance
Ted Maldonado, Jessica A. Bernard·The CerebellumPeer-reviewed·Feb 5, 2021
- Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation disrupts neuroplasticity of intracortical motor circuits.
Wei‐Yeh Liao, Ryoki Sasaki, … George M. Opie·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Jul 12, 2022
- Investigation of neuromodulatory effect of anodal cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation on the primary motor cortex using functional near-infrared spectroscopy
Zeshan Shoaib, Won Kee Chang, … Won‐Seok Kim·The CerebellumPeer-reviewed·Jan 12, 2023
- Cortical network mechanisms of anodal and cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation in awake primates
Andrew R. Bogaard, Guillaume Lajoie, … Eberhard E. Fetz·bioRxiv·Jul 8, 2019