Sign in
GeneticsGenetics
Peer-reviewed journal article

Powerful, efficient QTL mapping in Drosophila melanogaster using bulked phenotyping and pooled sequencing

Stuart J. MacdonaldiD, Kristen M. Cloud-Richardson, Dylan J. Sims‐WestiD, Anthony D. LongiD

Abstract

Despite the value of Recombinant Inbred Lines (RILs) for the dissection of complex traits, large panels can be difficult to maintain, distribute, and phenotype. An attractive alternative to RILs for many traits leverages selecting phenotypically-extreme individuals from a segregating population, and subjecting pools of selected and control individuals to sequencing. Under a bulked or extreme segregant analysis paradigm, genomic regions contributing to trait variation are revealed as frequency differences between pools. Here we describe such an extreme quantitative trait locus, or X-QTL mapping strategy that builds on an existing multiparental population, the DSPR (Drosophila Synthetic Population Resource), and involves phenotyping and genotyping a population derived by mixing hundreds of DSPR RILs. Simulations demonstrate that challenging, yet experimentally tractable X-QTL designs (>=4 replicates, >=5000 individuals/replicate, and a selection intensity of 5-10%) yield at least the same power as traditional RIL-based QTL mapping, and can localize variants with sub-centimorgan resolution. We empirically demonstrate the effectiveness of the approach using a 4-fold replicated X-QTL experiment that identifies 7 QTL for caffeine resistance. Two mapped X-QTL factors replicate loci previously identified in RILs, 6/7 are associated with excellent candidate genes, and RNAi knock-downs support the involvement of 4 genes in the genetic control of trait variation. For many traits of interest to drosophilists a bulked phenotyping/genotyping X-QTL design has considerable advantages.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISPool '16Macdonald '22Everman '19Bruni '26Burga '19Tran '21
65% semantic matchGenetics
John E Pool·bioRxiv·Jun 9, 2016