PLoS Computational BiologyNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Uncovering population contributions to the extracellular potential in the mouse visual system using Laminar Population Analysis
Atle E. RimehaugiD, Anders Martin DaleiD, Anton S. ArkhipoviD, Gaute T. EinevolliD
Abstract
The local field potential (LFP), the low-frequency part of the extracellular potential, reflects transmembrane currents in the vicinity of the recording electrode. Thought mainly to stem from currents caused by synaptic input, it provides information about neural activity complementary to that of spikes, the output of neurons. However, the many neural sources contributing to the LFP, and likewise the derived current source density (CSD), can often make it challenging to interpret. Efforts to improve its interpretability have included the application of statistical decomposition tools like principal component analysis (PCA) and independent component analysis (ICA) to disentangle the contributions from different neural sources. However, their underlying assumptions of, respectively, orthogonality and statistical independence are not always valid for the various processes or pathways generating LFP. Here, we expand upon and validate a decomposition algorithm named Laminar Population Analysis (LPA), which is based on physiological rather than statistical assumptions. LPA utilizes the multiunit activity (MUA) and LFP jointly to uncover the contributions of different populations to the LFP. To perform the validation of LPA, we used data simulated with the large-scale, biophysically detailed model of mouse V1 developed by the Allen Institute. We find that LPA can identify laminar positions within V1 and the temporal profiles of laminar population firing rates from the MUA. We also find that LPA can estimate the salient current sinks and sources generated by feedforward input from the lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN), recurrent activity in V1, and feedback input from the lateromedial (LM) area of visual cortex. LPA identifies and distinguishes these contributions with a greater accuracy than the alternative statistical decomposition methods, PCA and ICA. Lastly, we also demonstrate the application of LPA on experimentally recorded MUA and LFP from 24 animals in the publicly available Visual Coding dataset. Our results suggest that LPA can be used both as a method to estimate positions of laminar populations and to uncover salient features in LFP/CSD contributions from different populations. Author summaryTo make the best use of all the data collected in neuroscientific experiments, we need to develop appropriate analysis tools. In extracellular electrophysiological recordings, that is, measurements of electrical signals outside of cells produced by neural activity, the low-frequency part of the signal referred to as the local field potential (LFP) is often difficult to interpret due to the many neurons and biophysical processes contributing to this signal. Statistical tools have been used to decompose the recorded LFP with the aim of disentangling contributions from different neural populations and pathways. However, these methods are based on assumptions that can be invalid for LFP in the structure of interest. In this study, we extend and validate a method called laminar population analysis (LPA), which is based on physiological rather than statistical assumptions. We tested, developed, and validated LPA using simulated data from a large-scale, biophysically detailed model of mouse primary visual cortex. We found that LPA is able to tease apart several of the most salient contributions from different external inputs as well as the total contribution from recurrent activity within the primary visual cortex. We also demonstrate the application of LPA on experimentally recorded LFP.
- organism: mouse
- assay: electronic health records
- research focus: dimensionality reduction
- research focus: cell type annotation
- research focus: benchmarking
- research focus: software / tool
- approach: statistical model
- approach: experimental assay
- Citations
- 3
- FWCI
- 0.73
- Field percentile
- top 31%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Near-field potentials index local neural computations more accurately than population spiking
David A. Tovar, Jacob Alan Westerberg, … Alexander Maier·bioRxiv·May 11, 2023
- Reconstruction of post-synaptic potentials by reverse modeling of local field potentials
Maxime Yochum, Julien Modolo, … Fabrice Wendling·Journal of Neural EngineeringPeer-reviewed·Jan 4, 2019
- Modeling unitary fields and the single neuron contribution to local field potentials in the hippocampus
Maria T. Teleńczuk, Bartosz Teleńczuk, Alain Destexhe A·bioRxiv·Apr 16, 2020
- Local field potentials primarily reflect inhibitory neuron activity in human and monkey cortex
Bartosz Teleńczuk, Nima Dehghani, … Alain Destexhe A·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Jan 11, 2017
- A kernel-based method to calculate local field potentials from networks of spiking neurons
Bartosz Teleńczuk, Maria T. Teleńczuk, Alain Destexhe A·Journal of Neuroscience MethodsPeer-reviewed·Jul 17, 2020
- Kernel-based LFP estimation in detailed large-scale spiking network model of mouse visual cortex
Nicolò Meneghetti, Atle E. Rimehaug, … Torbjørn V. Ness·Neural NetworksPeer-reviewed·Jul 15, 2025