Validating the Representational Space of DeepReinforcement Learning Models of Behavior withNeural Data
Sebastian BruchiD, Patrick McClureiD, Jingfeng ZhouiD, Geoffrey M. SchoenbaumiD, Francisco PereiraiD
Abstract
Deep Reinforcement Learning (Deep RL) agents have in recent years emerged as successful models of animal behavior in a variety of complex learning tasks, as exemplified by Song et al. [2017]. As agents are typically trained to mimic an animal subject, the emphasis in past studies on behavior as a means of evaluating the fitness of models to experimental data is only natural. But the true power of Deep RL agents lies in their ability to learn neural computations and codes that generate a particular behavior--factors that are also of great relevance and interest to computational neuroscience. On that basis, we believe that model evaluation should include an examination of neural representations and validation against neural recordings from animal subjects. In this paper, we introduce a procedure to test hypotheses about the relationship between internal representations of Deep RL agents and those in animal neural recordings. Taking a sequential learning task as a running example, we apply our method and show that the geometry of representations learnt by artificial agents is similar to that of the biological subjects, and that such similarities are driven by shared information in some latent space. Our method is applicable to any Deep RL agent that learns a Markov Decision Process, and as such enables researchers to assess the suitability of more advanced Deep Learning modules, or map hierarchies of representations to different parts of a circuit in the brain, and help shed light on their function. To demonstrate that point, we conduct an ablation study to deduce that, in the sequential task under consideration, temporal information plays a key role in molding a correct representation of the task.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Deep learning-based location decoding reveals that across-day representational drift is better predicted by rewarded experience than time
Kipp Freud, Nathan F. Lepora, … Cian O’Donnell·bioRxiv·Feb 1, 2024
- Advances in deep reinforcement learning enable better predictions of human behavior in time-continuous tasks
Sabine Haberland, Hannes Ruge, Holger Frimmel·bioRxiv·May 20, 2025
- A melancholy machine: simulated synapse loss induces depression-like behaviors in deep reinforcement learning
Eric Chalmers, Santina Duarte, … Robert J. McDonald·bioRxiv·Jun 1, 2024
- Tracking and optimizing human performance using deep reinforcement learning in closed-loop behavioral- and neurofeedback: a proof of concept
Martin Dinov, Robert Leech·bioRxiv·Nov 28, 2017
- Time cell encoding in deep reinforcement learning agents depends on mnemonic demands
Dongyan Lin, Blake A. Richards·bioRxiv·Jul 15, 2021
- Global remapping emerges as the mechanism for renewal of context-dependent behavior in a reinforcement learning model
David Kappel, Sen Cheng·Frontiers in Computational NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jan 15, 2025