bioRxivNeurosciencePreprint
Cortical adaptation to muscle fatigue does not alter early proprioceptive processing in primary sensorimotor cortex
Junru CheniD, Toni MujuneniD, Feng LiiD, Riku NikanderiD, Harri PiitulaineniD
- Citations
- 0
Abstract
Muscle fatigue potentially interferes with proprioceptive afference from peripheral "movement sensors"-- the proprioceptors, which may hinder the crucial sensorimotor integration and thus locomotor performance. However, little is known about how muscle fatigue affects cortical processing of proprioceptive afference. Twenty-four healthy volunteers (30.7 {+/-} 6.5 yrs, 13 females) participated in the experiment, which included magnetoencephalography (MEG) recordings during ankle proprioceptive stimulation (2-Hz passive movements), and fatigue tasks comprised of isometric ankle plantar flexion. Corticokinematic coherence (CKC) between foot acceleration and MEG signals was examined before (PRE) and [~]3 min after (POST) the fatigue tasks to quantify the cortical proprioceptive processing. CKC peaked in the gradiometer pairs above the foot region of the primary sensorimotor (SM1) cortex in each participant. CKC strength did not show significant difference between PRE and POST at 2 Hz (0.30 {+/-} 0.12 vs. 0.30 {+/-} 0.14, p = 0.981) or its first harmonic at 4 Hz (0.38 {+/-} 0.14 vs. 0.37 {+/-} 0.13, p = 0.724). However, 4-Hz MEG power was [~]30% lower in POST than in PRE. Surprisingly, fatigue-induced bilateral increase of alpha and beta power was observed in SM1 hand regions during the movement stimulation. Our results indicated that the early processing of proprioceptive afference from the ankle joint was negligibly affected by muscle fatigue, or it recovered rapidly. The effects of muscle fatigue on the proprioceptive processing appear to extend beyond the primary somatotopic regions to bilateral SM1 neuronal networks. This cortical adaptation to muscle fatigue potentially preserves proprioceptive processing by modulating SM1 inhibitory neurons, offering a novel perspective for future research on proprioception.
- organism: human
- assay: electronic health records
- research focus: cell type annotation
- research focus: clustering
- research focus: differential expression
- research focus: gene regulatory network inference
- approach: statistical model
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- More comprehensive proprioceptive stimulation of the hand amplifies its cortical processing
Maria Hakonen, Timo Nurmi, … Harri Piitulainen·Journal of NeurophysiologyPeer-reviewed·Jul 20, 2022
- Feasibility and repeatability of MEG-compatible patellar-tendon stimulator for eliciting knee-joint proprioceptive cortical responses
Feng Li, Anni Byman, … Harri Piitulainen·Journal of Neuroscience MethodsPeer-reviewed·Sep 25, 2026
- Motor Cortical Output Integrates Distorted Proprioceptive Feedback
Yi Li, X. Hermione Xu, … Z. Josh Huang·bioRxiv·Nov 11, 2025
- Dynamic and context-dependent modulation of proprioceptive input in primate primary motor cortex
Junichiro Yoshida, Satomi Kikuta, … Kazuhiko Seki·bioRxiv·Sep 21, 2025
- Patellar tendon-tap intensity modulates response gain but not variability across cortical proprioceptive and stretch-reflex responses
Feng Li, Anni Byman, … Harri Piitulainen·bioRxiv·Sep 27, 2026
- Volitional hand activation intensifies cortical proprioceptive processing in the primary sensorimotor cortex
Maija Siltala, Timo Nurmi, … Harri Piitulainen·bioRxiv·Jun 11, 2026