henhaobio
Sign in

bioRxivMicrobiologyPreprint

Sign and strength of pairwise interactions in natural isolates depend on environment type.

Terence McAvoyiD, Elze HesseiD, Angus G. J. BucklingiD, Luke LeariD

PDFDOI

Abstract

Bacterial interactions-whether positive or negative - are crucial for the functioning of microbial communities. Though bacterial interactions are mainly expected to be negative, the sign and strength of interactions are predicted to be context dependent, with interactions typically being more positive in more stressful and nutrient-poor conditions. However, systematic studies investigating how the environment affects interactions between multiple taxa are lacking. Here, we determine if interactions between a panel of natural soil isolates change in response to the environment in which they are grown, with two different artificial media used (one simple and one complex) and a more ecologically relevant soil wash. To maximise natural variation in interactions, we collected multiple isolates from multiple sites: co-occurring (sympatric) isolates were predicted to show more negative interactions than allopatric isolates because of greater overlap in resource use. Pairwise interactions were in general negative, but more negative when grown in a complex lab-derived medium (Tryptic Soy Broth). Mutually beneficial interactions were most common in a simple resource medium (M9 minimal media) and exploitative interactions were most frequent in a soil broth. These patterns were independent of whether species originated from the same or a different site. The study supports the prediction that nutrient rich environments promote more negative interactions, and that measuring interactions of soil isolates in standard lab media is likely to misrepresent interactions occurring in natural environments.

Citations
0

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.