Persistence of SARS-CoV-2 and its surrogate, bacteriophage Phi6, on surfaces and in water

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has motivated research on the persistence of infectious SARS-CoV-2 in environmental reservoirs such as surfaces and water. Viral persistence data has been collected for SARS-CoV-2 and its surrogates, including bacteriophage Phi6. Despite its wide use, no side-by-side comparisons between Phi6 and SARS-CoV-2 exist. Here, we quantified the persistence of SARS-CoV-2 and Phi6 on surfaces (plastic and metal) and in water and evaluated the influence that the deposition solution has on viral persistence by using four commonly used deposition solutions: two culture media (DMEM and Tryptone Soya Broth (TSB)), Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS), and human saliva. Phi6 remained infectious in water significantly longer than SARS-CoV-2, having a half-life of 27 hours as compared with 15 hours for SARS-CoV-2. The persistence of viruses on surfaces was significantly influenced by the virus used and the deposition solution, but not by the surface material. Phi6 remained infectious significantly longer than SARS-CoV-2 when the inoculation solution was culture media (DMEM, TSB) and saliva. Using culture media and saliva led to half-lives between 9 hours and 2 weeks for Phi6, as compared to 0.5 to 2 hours for SARS-CoV-2. Using PBS as a deposition solution led to half-lives shorter than 4 hours for both viruses on all surfaces. Our results showed that, although it has been frequently used as a surrogate for coronaviruses, bacteriophage Phi6 is not an adequate surrogate for studies quantifying SARS-CoV-2 persistence, as it over-estimates infectiousness. Additionally, our findings reveal the need of using adequate deposition solutions when evaluating viral persistence on surfaces.