bioRxivGenomicsPreprint
de novo variant calling identifies cancer mutation profiles in the 1000 Genomes Project
Jeffrey K. NgiD, Pankaj VatsiD, Elyn Fritz‐WatersiD, Stephanie Sarkar, Eleanor I. SamsiD, Evin M. PadhiiD, Zachary L. PayneiD, Shawn Leonard, Marc A. West, Chandler Prince, Lee TraniiD, Marshall Jansen, George Vacek, Mehrzad SamadiiD, Timothy T. HarkinsiD, Craig S. PohliD, Tychele N. TurneriD
Abstract
Detection of de novo variants (DNVs) is critical for studies of disease-related variation and mutation rates. We developed a GPU-based workflow to rapidly call DNVs (HAT) and demonstrated its effectiveness by applying it to 4,216 Simons Simplex Collection (SSC) whole-genome sequenced parent-child trios from DNA derived from blood. In our SSC DNV data, we identified 78 {+/-} 15 DNVs per individual, 18% {+/-} 5% at CpG sites, 75% {+/-} 9% phased to the paternal chromosome of origin, and an average allele balance of 0.49. These calculations are all in line with DNV expectations. We sought to build a control DNV dataset by running HAT on 602 whole-genome sequenced parent-child trios from DNA derived from lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCLs) from the publicly available 1000 Genomes Project (1000G). In our 1000G DNV data, we identified 740 {+/-} 967 DNVs per individual, 14% {+/-} 4% at CpG sites, 61% {+/-} 11% phased to the paternal chromosome of origin, and an average allele balance of 0.41. Of the 602 trios, 80% had > 100 DNVs and we hypothesized the excess DNVs were cell line artifacts. Several lines of evidence in our data suggest that this is true and that 1000G does not appear to be a static reference. By mutation profile analysis, we tested whether these cell line artifacts were random and found that 40% of individuals in 1000G did not have random DNV profiles; rather they had DNV profiles matching B-cell lymphoma. Furthermore, we saw significant excess of protein-coding DNVs in 1000G in the gene IGLL5 that has already been implicated in this cancer. As a result of cell line artifacts, 1000G has variants present in DNA repair genes and at Clinvar pathogenic or likely-pathogenic sites. Our study elucidates important implications of the use of sequencing data from LCLs for both reference building projects as well as disease-related projects whereby these data are used in variant filtering steps.
- organism: human
- assay: whole-genome sequencing
- research focus: variant calling
- research focus: variant effect prediction
- research focus: benchmarking
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 8
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- HAT: de novo variant calling for highly accurate short-read and long-read sequencing data
Jeffrey K. Ng, Tychele N. Turner·BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2024
- Automated Identification of Germline de novo Mutations in Family Trios: A Consensus-Based Informatic Approach
Mariya Shadrina, Özem Kalay, … Bruce D. Gelb·bioRxiv·Mar 8, 2024
- Systematic evaluation of de novo mutation calling tools using whole genome sequencing data
Anushi Shah, Steven Monger, … Eleni Giannoulatou·Briefings in BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Nov 1, 2025
- Whole Genome De Novo Variant Identification with FreeBayes and Neural Network Approaches
Felix Richter, Sarah U. Morton, … Yufeng Shen·bioRxiv·Mar 24, 2020
- Genomic variant calling: Flexible tools and a diagnostic data set
Michael Lawrence, Melanie A. Huntley, … Robert Gentleman·bioRxiv·Sep 18, 2015
- DeNovoCNN: A deep learning approach to de novo variant calling in next generation sequencing data
Gelana Khazeeva, Karolis Šablauskas, … Christian Gilissen·Nucleic Acids ResearchPeer-reviewed·Jun 17, 2022