PLoS ONESystems BiologyPeer-reviewed journal article
Homeostasis at different backgrounds: The roles of overlayed feedback structures in vertebrate photoadaptation
Abstract
We have studied the resetting behavior of eight basic integral controller motifs with respect to different but constant backgrounds. We found that the controllers split symmetrically into two classes: one class, based on derepression of the compensatory flux, leads to more rapid resetting kinetics as backgrounds increase. The other class, which directly activates the compensatory flux, shows a slowing down in the resetting at increased backgrounds. We found a striking analogy between the resetting kinetics of vertebrate photoreceptors and controllers based on derepression, i.e. vertebrate rod or cone cells show decreased sensitivities and accelerated response kinetics as background illuminations increase. The central molecular model of vertebrate photoadaptation consists of an overlay of three negative feedback loops with cytosolic calcium [Formula], cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) and cyclic nucleotide-gated (CNG) channels as components. While in one of the feedback loops the extrusion of [Formula] by potassium-dependent sodium-calcium exchangers (NCKX) can lead to integral control with cGMP as the controlled variable, the expected robust perfect adaptation of cGMP is lost, because of the two other feedback loops. They avoid that [Formula] levels become too high and toxic. Looking at psychophysical laws, we found that in all of the above mentioned basic controllers Webers law is followed when a "just noticeable difference" (threshold) of 1% of the controlled variables set-point was considered. Applying comparable threshold pulses or steps to the photoadaptation model we find, in agreement with experimental results, that Webers law is followed for relatively high backgrounds, while Stephens power law gives a better description when backgrounds are low. Limitations of our photoadaption model, in particular with respect to potassium/sodium homeostasis, are discussed. Finally, we discuss possible implication of background perturbations in biological controllers when compensatory fluxes are based on activation.
- Citations
- 3
- FWCI
- 0.27
- Field percentile
- 42th percentile
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Coherent feedback leads to robust background compensation in oscillatory and non-oscillatory homeostats
Melissa Nygård, Peter Ruoff·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Aug 28, 2023
- Multifaceted luminance gain control beyond photoreceptors in Drosophila
Madhura D. Ketkar, Shuai Shao, … Marion Silies·bioRxiv·Mar 17, 2023
- Analysis of calcium dynamics for dim-light responses in rod and cone photoreceptors
A. Abtout, J. Reingruber·bioRxiv·Mar 22, 2022
- Light adaptation explains different linearity of ON and OFF responses
Matteo Carandini·bioRxiv·Feb 9, 2016
- Background compensation revisited: Conserved phase response curves in frequency controlled homeostats with coherent feedback
Peter Ruoff·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Sep 4, 2024
- Taking it slow: A positive feedback chloride current in cone photoreceptors supports slow motion detection
Matthew Yedutenko, Marcus H. C. Howlett, … Maarten Kamermans·bioRxiv·Dec 14, 2025