Heterogeneous Contribution of Microdeletions in the Development of Common Generalized and Focal epilepsies
Eduardo Pérez‐PalmaiD, Ingo HelbigiD, Karl Martin KleiniD, Verneri AnttilaiD, Heiko HorniD, Eva Maria Reinthaler, Padhraig GormleyiD, Andrea GannaiD, Andrea Byrnes, Katharina Pernhorst, Mohammad Reza ToliatiD, Elmo SaarentausiD, Daniel P. HowriganiD, Per Hoffman, Juan Francisco MiqueliD, Giancarlo V De FerrariiD, Peter NürnbergiD, Holger LercheiD, Fritz ZimprichiD, Bernd Axel NeubaueriD, Albert J. BeckeriD, Felix RosenowiD, Emilio PeruccaiD, Federico ZaraiD, Yvonne G. WeberiD, Dennis LaliD
Abstract
BackgroundMicrodeletions are known to confer risk to epilepsy, particularly at genomic rearrangement \"hotspot\" loci. However, deciphering their role outside hotspots and risk assessment by epilepsy sub-type has not been conducted.\n\nMethodsWe assessed the burden, frequency and genomic content of rare, large microdeletions found in a previously published cohort of 1,366 patients with Genetic Generalized Epilepsy (GGE) plus two sets of additional unpublished genome-wide microdeletions found in 281 Rolandic Epilepsy (RE) and 807 Adult Focal Epilepsy (AFE) patients, totaling 2,454 cases. These microdeletion sets were assessed in a combined analysis and in sub-type specific approaches against 6,746 ethnically matched controls.\n\nResultsWhen hotspots are considered, we detected an enrichment of microdeletions in the combined epilepsy analysis (adjusted-P= 2.00x10-7; OR = 1.89; 95%-CI: 1.51-2.35), where the implicated microdeletions overlapped with rarely deleted genes and those involved in neurodevelopmental processes. Sub-type specific analyses showed that hotspot deletions in the GGE subgroup contribute most of the signal (adjusted-P = 1.22x10-12; OR = 7.45; 95%-CI = 4.20-11.97). Outside hotspot loci, microdeletions were enriched in the GGE cohort for neurodevelopmental genes (adjusted-P = 4.78x10-3; OR = 2.30; 95%-CI = 1.42-3.70), whereas no additional signal was observed for RE and AFE. Still, gene content analysis was able to identify known (NRXN1, RBFOX1 and PCDH7) and novel (LOC102723362) candidate genes affected in more than one epilepsy sub-type but not in controls.\n\nConclusionsOur results show a heterogeneous effect of recurrent and non-recurrent microdeletions as part of the genetic architecture of GGE and a minor to negligible contribution in the etiology of RE and AFE.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Organism
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Assessment of burden and segregation profiles of CNVs in patients with epilepsy
Claudia Moreau, Frédérique Tremblay, … Simon Girard·Annals of Clinical and Translational NeurologyPeer-reviewed·Jun 8, 2022
- Evaluation of copy number burden in specific epilepsy types from a genome-wide study of 18,564 subjects
Lisa‐Marie Niestroj, Daniel P. Howrigan, … Epi25 Collaborative·bioRxiv·May 27, 2019
- The role of rare genetic variants enrichment in epilepsies of presumed genetic etiology
Linnaeus Bundalian, Yin-Yuan Su, … Epi25 Collaborative·medRxiv·Jan 17, 2023
- Genome-wide meta-analysis of over 29,000 people with epilepsy reveals 26 loci and subtype-specific genetic architecture
Samuel Frank Berkovic, Gianpiero L. Cavalleri, Bobby P.C. Koeleman·medRxiv·Jun 8, 2022
- Exome sequencing of 20,979 individuals with epilepsy reveals shared and distinct ultra-rare genetic risk across disorder subtypes
Epi25 Collaborative, Siwei Chen, … Alica M. Goldman·Nature NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Oct 1, 2024
- Ultra-rare genetic variation in the epilepsies: a whole-exome sequencing study of 17,606 individuals
Yen‐Chen Anne Feng, Daniel P. Howrigan, … Ingo Borggräfe·The American Journal of Human GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Jul 18, 2019