Sign in
NeuroscienceMovement Disorders
Peer-reviewed journal article

Cortical network fingerprints predict deep brain stimulation outcome in dystonia

Gabriel González‐EscamillaiD, Muthuraman MuthuramaniD, Martin M. ReichiD, Nabin KoiralaiD, Christian Heiner RiedeliD, Martin B. Glaser, Florian LangeiD, Günther DeuschliD, Jens VolkmanniD, Sergiu GroppaiD

Abstract

BackgroundDeep brain stimulation (DBS) is an effective evidence-based therapy for dystonia. However, no unequivocal predictors of therapy responses exist. We investigate whether patients optimally responding to DBS present distinct brain network organization and structural patterns.\n\nMethodsBased on a German multicentre cohort of eighty-two dystonia patients with segmental and generalized dystonia, who received DBS implantation in the globus pallidus internus patients were classified based on the clinical response 36 months after DBS, as superior-outcome group or moderate-outcome group, as above or below 70% motor improvement, respectively. Fifty-one patients met MRI-quality and treatment response requirements (mean age 51.3 {+/-} 13.2 years; 25 female) and were included into further analysis. From preoperative MRI we assessed cortical thickness and structural covariance, which were then fed into network analysis using graph theory. We designed a support vector machine to classify subjects for the clinical response based on group network properties and individual grey matter fingerprints.\n\nResultsThe moderate-outcome group showed cortical atrophy mainly in the sensorimotor and visuomotor areas and disturbed network topology in these regions. From all the structural integrity of the cortical mantle explained about 45% of the stimulation amplitude. Classification analyses achieved 88% of accuracy using individual grey matter atrophy patterns to predict DBS outcome.\n\nConclusionsThe analysis of cortical integrity and network properties could be developed into independent predictors to identify dystonia patients who benefit from DBS.

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers
Citations
24
FWCI
2.03
Field percentile
top 14%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISChen '17Wang '22Al‐Fatly '19Desai '25Cho '20Baldermann '21
71% semantic matchNeuroscience
Xiaoyu Chen, Chencheng Zhang, Yuxin Li+6 more·bioRxiv·Oct 17, 2017