bioRxivGenomicsPreprint
The Sheep and the Goats: Distinguishing transcriptional enhancers in a complex chromatin landscape
Abstract
Predicting regulatory function of non-coding DNA using genomic information remains a major goal in genomics, and an important step in interpreting the cis-regulatory code. Regulatory capacity can be partially inferred from transcription factor occupancy, histone modifications, motif enrichment, and evolutionary conservation. However, combinations of these features in well-studied systems such as Drosophila have limited predictive accuracy. Here we examine the current limits of computational enhancer prediction by applying machine-learning methods to an extensive set of genomic features, validating predictions with the Fly Enhancer Resource, which characterized the transcriptional activity of approximately fifteen percent of the genome. Supervised machine learning trained on a range of genomic features identify active elements with a high degree of accuracy, but are less successful at distinguishing tissue-specific expression patterns. Consistent with previous observations of their widespread genomic interactions, many transcription factors were associated with enhancers not known to be direct functional targets. Interestingly, no single factor was necessary for enhancer identification, although binding by the 'pioneer' transcription factor Zelda was the most predictive feature for enhancer activity. Using an increasing number of predictive features improved classification with diminishing returns. Thus, additional single-timepoint ChIP data may have only marginal utility for discerning true regulatory regions. On the other hand, spatially- and temporally-differentiated genomic features may provide more power for this type of computational enhancer identification. Inclusion of new types of information distinct from current chromatin-immunoprecipitation data may enable more precise identification of enhancers, and further insight into the features that distinguish their biological functions.
- organism: Drosophila
- assay: ChIP-seq
- research focus: gene regulatory network inference
- approach: machine learning (classical)
- Citations
- 1
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- A cross-organism framework for supervised enhancer prediction with epigenetic pattern recognition and targeted validation
Anurag Sethi, Mengting Gu, … Mark Gerstein·Nature MethodsPeer-reviewed·Jul 29, 2020
- A semi-supervised approach uncovers thousands of intragenic enhancers differentially activated in human cells
Juan Gonzalez-Vallinas, Amadís Pagès, … Eduardo Eyras·bioRxiv·Jun 3, 2015
- Enhancer prediction in the human genome by probabilistic modelling of the chromatin feature patterns
Maria Osmala, Harri J Lähdesmäki·BMC BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Jul 20, 2020
- EnhancerDetector: Enhancer Discovery from Human to Fly via Interpretable Deep Learning
Luis M. Solis, Geyenna Sterling-Lentsch, … Hani Z. Girgis·BMC GenomicsPeer-reviewed·Sep 1, 2026
- Exploiting regulatory heterogeneity to systematically identify enhancers with high accuracy
Hamutal Arbel, Sumanta Basu, … James B. Brown·Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesPeer-reviewed·Dec 31, 2018
- EnhancerP-2L: A Gene regulatory site identification tool for DNA enhancer region using CREs motifs
Ahmad Hassan Butt, Salem Alkhalaf, … Yaser Daanial Khan·bioRxiv·Jan 20, 2020