Epigenetics for Public Consumption: Evaluating Science Communication Strategies and Practices on YouTube
Aantaki RaisaiD, Irania Santaliz‐MorenoiD, Amy AyalaiD, Jada G. HamiltoniD, Amy McQueeniD, George P. SouroullasiD, Julia MakiiD, Erika A. WatersiD
Abstract
BackgroundEpigenetics--the study of reversible changes in gene expression without altering the underlying DNA sequence--is increasingly applied in medical, commercial, and policy contexts. Yet, little is known about how this emerging science is communicated to the public. The purpose of this study was to examine communication strategies, sources, and modalities in epigenetic-related videos on YouTube- the most accessed platform for informal science education. MethodsWe conducted a mixed-methods content analysis of 294 YouTube videos on epigenetics by conducting a keyword-based search on October 17, 2023. Video transcripts and meta-data were coded using a codebook developed both deductively and inductively. Qualitative analysis examined how communication strategies were used within videos and identified emergent themes (RQ1). Quantitative analyses examined the frequency of video and channel characteristics (RQ2), and presentation modalities (RQ3). ResultsFindings reveal poor alignment with science communication best practices (RQ1): over 92% of videos failed to acknowledge scientific uncertainty, the comprehensibility level exceeded the recommended 8th-grade level (e.g., average readability grade 10.7), and professional research organizations were notably absent. Narrators were mostly male (56.7%) and white-presenting (73.7%) (RQ2). The majority of the videos used multi-modal strategies (e.g., visual texts mixed with animation and voice-over narration) to communicate epigenetic information (RQ3). ConclusionFindings highlight the need for professional research organizations to be more proactive in public epigenetic communication efforts. Increasing narrator demographic diversity could broaden audience reach. Evidence-based communication tools are needed for health or science communicators discussing epigenetics on social media.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- "Wissenschaft fürs Wohnzimmer" - two years of interactive, scientific livestreams weekly on YouTube
- If Research is Not the Evidence, What is it? The Lack of Research Citations in Health Vlogs
N. Atef·bioRxiv·Apr 25, 2022
- Natural history museums are missing an opportunity to present research and collections on YouTube
Selina A. Ruzi, Adrian A. Smith, … Timothy A. Dinh·Frontiers in CommunicationPeer-reviewed·Jun 30, 2026
- Can scientists fill the science journalism void? Online public engagement with science stories authored by scientists
Y. Barel-Ben David, E. S. Garty, A. Baram-Tsabari·bioRxiv·Sep 6, 2019
- Understanding science communication in human genetics using text mining
J. J. Morosoli, L. Colodro-Conde, … S. E. Medland·bioRxiv·Jul 24, 2020
- Misinformation, Perceptions Towards COVID-19 and Willingness to be Vaccinated: A Population-Based Survey in Yemen
A. N. Bitar, M. Zawiah, … A. H. Khan·bioRxiv·Feb 25, 2021