bioRxivImmunologyPreprint
Geographically Biased Composition of NetMHCpan Training Datasets and Evaluation of MHC-Peptide Binding Prediction Accuracy on Novel Alleles
T. K. Atkins, A. Solanki, J. Cornette, G. Vasmatzis, M. Riedel
Abstract
Bias in neural network model training datasets has been observed to decrease prediction accuracy for groups underrepresented in training data. Thus, investigating the composition of training datasets used in machine learning models with health-care applications is vital to ensure equity. Two such machine learning models are NetMHCpan-4.1 and NetMHCIIpan-4.0, used to predict antigen binding scores to major histocompatibility complex class I and II molecules, respectively. As antigen presentation is a critical step in mounting the adaptive immune response, previous work has used these or similar predictions models in a broad array of applications, from explaining asymptomatic viral infection to cancer neoantigen prediction. However, these models have also been shown to be biased toward hydrophobic peptides, suggesting the network could also contain other sources of bias. Here, we report the composition of the networks training datasets are heavily biased toward European Caucasian individuals and against Asian and Pacific Islander individuals. We test the ability of NetMHCpan-4.1 and NetMHCpan-4.0 to distinguish true binders from randomly generated peptides on alleles not included in the training datasets. Unexpectedly, we fail to find evidence that the disparities in training data lead to a meaningful difference in prediction quality for alleles not present in the training data. We attempt to explain this result by mapping the HLA sequence space to determine the sequence diversity of the training dataset. Furthermore, we link the residues which have the greatest impact on NetMHCpan predictions to structural features for three alleles (HLA-A*34:01, HLA-C*04:03, HLA-DRB1*12:02).
- organism: human
- assay: proteomics
- research focus: host-pathogen & immune response
- research focus: benchmarking
- approach: statistical model
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Predicting Peptide-MHC Binding Affinities With Imputed Training Data
Alex Rubinsteyn, Timothy O'Donnell, … Jeff Hammerbacher·bioRxiv·Jun 7, 2016
- Towards Equitable MHC Binding Predictions: Computational Strategies to Assess and Reduce Data Bias
Eric Glynn, Dario Ghersi, Mona Singh·bioRxiv·Jan 30, 2024
- Discordant results among MHC binding affinity prediction tools
Austin Nguyen, Abhinav Nellore, Reid F. Thompson·bioRxiv·Dec 4, 2022
- MHChron: diversity-balanced dataset design for robust peptide-MHC binding prediction across MHC class I and II
Marta Chronowska, Eugene Shrimpton-Phoenix, Tadas Kluonis·bioRxiv·Aug 4, 2026
- Attention mechanism-based deep learning pan-specificmodel for interpretable MHC-I peptide binding prediction
Jing Jin, Zhonghao Liu, … Jianjun Hu·bioRxiv·Nov 7, 2019
- Evaluation of machine learning methods to predict peptide binding to MHC Class I proteins
Rohit Bhattacharya, Ashok Sivakumar, … Rachel Karchin·bioRxiv·Jul 27, 2017