Evaluating treatments for the protection of grapevine pruning wounds from natural infection by trunk disease fungi
Catarina LealiD, Rebeca Bujanda, Beatriz López‐ManzanaresiD, Sonia Ojeda, Mónica BerbegaliD, Ana Villa-LlopiD, Luis Gonzaga SantestebaniD, Julián PalaciosiD, David GramajeiD
Abstract
Infection of grapevines by fungal pathogens causing grapevine trunk diseases (GTDs) primarily arises from annual pruning wounds made during the dormant season. While various studies have showcased the efficacy of products in shielding pruning wounds against GTDs infections, most of these investigations hinge on artificial pathogen inoculations, which may not faithfully mirror real field conditions. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the efficacy of various liquid formulation fungicides (pyraclostrobin + boscalid) and paste treatments, as well as biological control agents (BCA: Trichoderma atroviride SC1, T. atroviride I-1237, and T. asperellum ICC012 + T. gamsii ICC080), for their potential to prevent natural infection of grapevine pruning wounds by trunk disease fungi in two field trials located in Samaniego (Northern Spain) and Madiran (Southern France) over three growing seasons. Wound treatments were applied immediately after pruning in February. One year after pruning, canes were harvested from vines and brought to the laboratory for assessment of Trichoderma spp. and fungal trunk pathogens. More than 1,200 fungal isolates associated with five GTDs (esca, Botryophaeria, Diaporthe and Eutypa diebacks, and Cytospora canker) were collected from the two vineyards each growing season. Our findings reveal that none of the products under investigation exhibited complete effectiveness against all the GTDs. The efficacy of these products was particularly influenced by the specific year of study. A notable exception was observed with the biocontrol agent T. atroviride I-1237, which consistently demonstrated effectiveness against Botryosphaeria dieback infections throughout each year of the study, irrespective of the location. The remaining products exhibited efficacy in specific years or locations against particular diseases, with the physical barrier (paste) showing the least overall effectiveness. The recovery rates of Trichoderma spp. in treated plants were highly variable, ranging from 17% to 100%, with both strains of T. atroviride yielding the highest isolation rates. This study underscores the importance of customizing treatments for specific diseases, taking into account the influence of environmental factors for BCA applications.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 15
- FWCI
- 3.11
- Field percentile
- top 9%
- Organism
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Protection of grapevine pruning wounds against Phaeomoniella chlamydospora and Diplodia seriata by biological and chemical methods
M. d. P. Martinez-Diz, E. Diaz-Losada, … D. Gramaje·Crop ProtectionPeer-reviewed·May 1, 2021
- In vitro evaluation of grapevine endophytes, epiphytes and sap micro-organisms for potential use to control grapevine trunk disease pathogens.
R. Blundell, M. Arreguin, A. Eskalen·bioRxiv·Feb 9, 2021
- Biocontrol potential of grapevine endophytes against grapevine trunk pathogens
I. Silva-Valderrama, D. Toapanta, … A. Castro·bioRxiv·Sep 28, 2020
- Field evaluation of biocontrol agents against black-foot and Petri diseases of grapevine
M. d. P. Martinez-Diz, E. Diaz-Losada, … D. Gramaje·bioRxiv·May 19, 2020
- Grapevine pruning time affects natural wound colonization by wood-invading fungi
M. d. P. Martinez-Diz, A. Eichmeier, … D. Gramaje·Fungal EcologyPeer-reviewed·Dec 1, 2020
- Phyllosphere microbiome-based biocontrol solution against Botrytis cinerea and Plasmopara viticola in grapevine
Nicolas-David Rappo, Sylvain Schnée, … Sébastien Bruisson·bioRxiv·Feb 10, 2025