Floral display size does not affect the distribution of paternal diversity in Silene dioica
Nina JoffardiD, Ihsen Lecat, Kate Ollier, Camille JoliveliD, Eric Schmitt, Cécile Godé, Estelle BarbotiD, Mathilde DufaÿiD, Isabelle De CauweriD
Abstract
Premise of the studyPaternal diversity and its distribution within maternal plants is governed by various factors, including frequency of pollinator visits, patterns of pollinator movement and pollen carryover. Floral display size may have opposite effects on fruit and plant-level paternal diversity, because plants with large displays should receive more pollinator visits but also more sequential probes per visit. MethodsTo investigate the effect of floral display size on the distribution of paternal diversity in Silene dioica, we genotyped and assigned paternity for 1320 seeds sampled in several fruits per plant in control and manipulated females, whose flower number was artificially increased. We estimated within-fruit paternal diversity and sire profile dissimilarity among fruits and compared these metrics between control and manipulated plants. We then studied pollen carryover using controlled pollinator visits and pollen counts. Key resultsMost fruits were multiply sired, but we found no effect of flower supplementation on within-fruit paternal diversity. Sire profiles were more similar between fruits located on the same than on different females, but sire profile similarity was not higher within manipulated than within control plants. The pollen deposition curve was steep, with an increasing carryover fraction throughout the visitation sequence. ConclusionsOur results suggest that the effect of floral display size on pollinator foraging behaviour is too weak to affect paternal diversity and its distribution in S. dioica, or that other processes, such as limited pollen carryover and spatially restricted pollen dispersal, blur the effect of pollinator visit frequency and movements on sire profiles.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 2
- Organism
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Effects of sexual dimorphism on pollinator behaviour in a dioecious species
L. Moquet, A.-L. Jacquemart, … I. De Cauwer·bioRxiv·Apr 15, 2021
- Sex and origin-specific inbreeding effects on flower attractiveness to specialised pollinators
K. Schrieber, S. C. Paul, … E. Eilers·bioRxiv·Jan 8, 2021
- Male-biased sexual selection persists across contrasting habitats in a dioecious plant
Camille Jolivel, Nina Joffard, … Isabelle De Cauwer·bioRxiv·Feb 19, 2026
- Pollinator and flower morphology interact to influence pollen receipt
Ethan Newman, Allan G. Ellis, Bruce Anderson·bioRxiv·May 16, 2025
- Can Sexual Selection Cause Divergence In Mating System-Related Floral Traits?
A. Lankinen, M. Strandh·bioRxiv·Jan 7, 2019
- Do flowers with specialized morphologies produce more nectar and pollen?
Tamar Keasar, Levona Bodner·American Journal of BotanyPeer-reviewed·Nov 1, 2025