PLoS ONENeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
A frequency peak at 3.1 kHz obtained from the spectral analysis of the cochlear implant electrocochleography noise
Javiera HerradaiD, Vicente MedeliD, Constantino D. DragiceviciD, Juan Cristóbal MaassiD, Carlos Stott C, Paul Hinckley DelanoiD
Abstract
IntroductionThe functional evaluation of auditory-nerve activity in spontaneous conditions has remained elusive in humans. In animals, the frequency analysis of the round-window electrical noise recorded by means of electrocochleography yields a frequency peak at around 900 to 1000 Hz, which has been proposed to reflect auditory-nerve spontaneous activity. Here, we studied the spectral components of the electrical noise obtained from cochlear implant electrocochleography in humans. MethodsWe recruited adult cochlear implant recipients from the Clinical Hospital of the Universidad de Chile, between the years 2021 and 2022. We used the AIM System from Advanced Bionics(R) to obtain single trial electrocochleography signals from the most apical electrode in cochlear implant users. We performed a protocol to study spontaneous activity and auditory responses to 0.5 and 2 kHz tones ResultsTwenty subjects including 12 females, with a mean age of 57.9 {+/-} 12.6 years (range between 36 and 78 years) were recruited. The electrical noise of the single trial cochlear implant electrocochleography signal yielded a reliable peak at 3.1 kHz in 55% of the cases (11 out of 20 subjects), while an oscillatory pattern that masked the spectrum was observed in seven cases. In the other two cases, the single-trial noise was not classifiable. Auditory stimulation at 0.5 kHz and 2.0 kHz did not change the amplitude of the 3.1 kHz frequency peak. ConclusionWe found two main types of noise patterns in the frequency analysis of the single-trial noise from cochlear implant electrocochleography, including a peak at 3.1 kHz that might reflect auditory-nerve spontaneous activity, while the oscillatory pattern probably corresponds to an artifact.
- Citations
- 1
- FWCI
- 0.28
- Field percentile
- 44th percentile
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Distinct cortical encoding of acoustic and electrical cochlear stimulation
Ariel Edward Hight, Michele N. Insanally, … Robert C. Froemke·bioRxiv·Aug 1, 2025
- Direct cochlear recordings in humans show a theta rhythmic modulation of the auditory nerve by selective attention
Quirin Gehmacher, Patrick Reisinger, … Nathan Weisz·Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jan 3, 2022
- Neural responses to movie naturalistic stimuli are related to listening demand in cochlear implant users
Bowen Xiu, Brandon T. Paul, … Andrew Dimitrijevic·bioRxiv·Sep 2, 2022
- Neural tracking of the speech envelope in cochlear implant users
Ben Somers, Eline Verschueren, Tom Francart·Journal of Neural EngineeringPeer-reviewed·Oct 8, 2018
- EEG-based diagnostics of the auditory system using cochlear implant electrodes as sensors
Ben Somers, Christopher J. Long, Tom Francart·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Mar 8, 2021
- Event-Related Potentials of Single Sided Deaf Cochlear Implant Users - Using a Semantic Oddball Paradigm in Noise
Marcus Windsor Rao Voola, Andre Wedekind, … Dayse Távora‐Vieira·Audiology and NeurotologyPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2023