Plant Cell ReportsPlant BiologyPeer-reviewed journal article
Evaluation of computational tools for predicting CRISPR gRNA on-target efficiency in plants.
Zheng GongiD, Mengyi Chen, Hailong ZhangiD, Jenny C. MortimeriD, José Ramón BotellaiD
Abstract
CRISPR technologies has become an integral part of plant biotechnology, synthetic biology and basic plant research, routinely used by researchers for targeted genome modifications. CRISPR guide RNAs (gRNAs) undermines the highly programmable nature of CRISPR, enabling site-specific genome editing. However, different gRNA targets showed highly variable on-target effectiveness and poor gRNA design could amount to wasting valuable scientific resources. There has been broad development of computational and web-based tools for gRNA efficiency predictions but their performances in plant genome editing remains controversial or untested. Hence, in this study, we systematically evaluated over 20 accessible, web-based in silico gRNA on-target efficiency prediction tools using an experimental plant genome editing dataset. Excitingly, we identified multiple tools, mostly developed using machine learning, that were highly predictive of gRNA on-target genome editing efficiency in planta. The prediction scores assigned to gRNAs in the dataset by these tools were significantly correlated with the frequency of CRISPR-mediated InDels in plants. Furthermore, we evaluated efficiency prediction scores available on popular platforms such as CRISPOR and CRISPR-P which contain large numbers of non-model plant genomes. Our analysis showed that some prediction scores on CRISPOR performed quite well which allows efficient integration of on-target and off-target predictions. Overall, we believe that our study provided insights on improving gRNA design during conventional plant genome editing workflows and should also help unfamiliar researchers interested in CRISPR/SpCas9 genome editing.
- organism: plant (other)
- assay: CRISPR screen
- research focus: benchmarking
- approach: machine learning (classical)
- Citations
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.10
- Field percentile
- top 6%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- CRISPRedict: The case for simple and interpretable efficiency prediction for CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing
Vasileios Konstantakos, Anastasios Nentidis, … Γεώργιος Παλιούρας·bioRxiv·Apr 7, 2022
- Predicting CRISPR-Cas12a guide efficiency for targeting using Machine Learning
Aidan R. O’Brien, Denis C. Bauer, Gaétan Burgio·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Oct 17, 2023
- CRISPR-DT: designing gRNAs for the CRISPR-Cpf1 system with improved target efficiency and specificity
Houxiang Zhu, Chun Liang·BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Jan 2, 2019
- A benchmark of computational CRISPR-Cas9 guide design methods
Jacob Bradford, Dimitri Perrin·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Aug 29, 2019
- Usefulness of Current sgRNA Design Guidelines and in vitro Cleavage Assays for Plant CRISPR/Cas Genome Editing: A Case in Eggplant (Solanum melongena L.)
Mark Gabriel S. Sagarbarria, John Albert M. Caraan, Angelo John Gilbuena Layos·Transgenic ResearchPeer-reviewed·Oct 24, 2023
- ChromeCRISPR - A High Efficacy Hybrid Machine Learning Model for CRISPR/Cas On-Target Predictions
Amirhossein Daneshpajouh, Megan Fowler, Kay C. Wiese·bioRxiv·Apr 16, 2025