Sign in
BioinformaticsProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Peer-reviewed journal article

Evaluating large language models in biomedical data science challenges through a classroom experiment

Huifang Ma, Zhicheng JiiD, Tara Al-Hashimy, Austin Allen, Nan CeniD, Orlando Chen, Yongyin Chen, Yutian CheniD, Tong Cheng, Yueqi Gu, Bing JiiD, Xiaohui JiangiD, Fengnan Li, P J LiiD, Yueshan Liang, Bena Liu, Coco Liu, E.C. MaiD, Zhicheng MaiD, Vicky Shao, Mengyao Shi, Jiang Shu, Leyi Sun, Rushi Tang, Hanyu Wang, , Y. ZhangiD

Abstract

Large language models have shown remarkable capabilities in algorithm design, but their effectiveness in solving data science challenges remains poorly understood. We conducted a classroom experiment in which graduate students used large language models (LLMs) to solve biomedical data science challenges on Kaggle. While their submissions did not top the leaderboards, their prediction scores were often close to those of leading human participants. LLMs frequently recommended gradient boosting methods, which were associated with better performance. Among prompting strategies, self-refinement, where the LLM improves its own initial solution, was the most effective, a result validated using additional LLMs. These findings demonstrate that LLMs can design competitive machine learning solutions, even when used by non-experts.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers
Citations
1
FWCI
0.40
Field percentile
top 32%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.