Age-specific pediatric templates improve EEG source-reconstructed biomarkers in children
Marit van den BergiD, Tina Ganjipour, Marina DiachenkoiD, Maria CandelleroiD, Huibert D. MansvelderiD, Hilgo BruiningiD, Arthur-Ervin AvramieaiD, Klaus Linkenkaer-HanseniD
Abstract
EEG source reconstruction requires an anatomical head model, ideally constructed from individual magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. In developmental studies of children and adolescents, however, MRIs are rarely available. Researchers therefore routinely rely on adult templates, such as the FreeSurfer average (fsaverage), despite substantial anatomical changes throughout development. How much this reliance on adult models biases downstream EEG biomarkers remains unclear. Here, we investigated whether age-specific pediatric templates offer a better alternative to fsaverage for EEG-derived biomarkers in children and adolescents, using individual MRI-based reconstruction as the reference. We analyzed eyes-closed resting-state EEGs from 384 Healthy Brain Network participants aged 5.5 to 17.5 years. For each participant, we tested three anatomical models: their individual MRI, an age-specific pediatric template from a series spanning ages 6-17 at one-year intervals, and the adult fsaverage template. We compared four EEG biomarkers in childhood and adolescence: absolute power, relative power, long-range temporal correlations quantified with detrended fluctuation analysis (DFA), and functional excitation-inhibition (fE/I) ratio. Pediatric templates agreed more closely with individual MRI-based biomarkers in both developmental groups and had fewer parcels with significantly different biomarker values than the adult template, except for absolute power in older adolescents. We conclude that when individual MRI is not available, age-specific pediatric templates match individual MRI-based EEG biomarker values more closely than the adult template across all four biomarkers up to approximately 12 years of age and should be the preferred choice at least up to this age.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Structural templates for imaging EEG cortical sources in infants
Christian O’Reilly, Eric Larson, … Mayada Elsabbagh·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Dec 29, 2020
- EEG-based age-prediction models as stable and heritable indicators of brain maturational level in children and adolescents
Marjolein M. L. J. Z. Vandenbosch, Dennis van ‘t Ent, … Dirk J. A. Smit·Human Brain MappingPeer-reviewed·Jan 4, 2019
- Do try this at home: Age prediction from sleep and meditation with large-scale low-cost mobile EEG
Hubert J. Banville, Maurice Abou Jaoude, … Denis Alexander Engemann·Imaging NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2024
- A growth chart of brain function from infancy to adolescence based on electroencephalography
Kartik K. Iyer, James A. Roberts, … Nathan J. Stevenson·EBioMedicinePeer-reviewed·Mar 27, 2024
- An Open-Source End-to-End Pipeline for Large-Scale EEG-Based Brain Age Modelling
Siddharth Rajesh, Deepshik Sharma, … P.N. Ravindra·bioRxiv·Aug 10, 2026
- The Lifespan Architecture of Human EEG
Milana Kasab, Sahar Allouch, … Mahmoud Hassan·bioRxiv·Jul 31, 2026