Plant PathologyPlant BiologyPeer-reviewed journal article
Pea-Saving Partners: Bacillus and Pseudomonas combat downy mildew in pea crops
Emeka Chibuzor OkechukwuiD, Catherine Jimenez‐QuirosiD, Ömür BaysaliD, Süreyya KocamaziD, Burhan ArıkaniD, Anne WebbiD, Thomas WoodiD, Sanu AroraiD, Claire DomoneyiD, David John StudholmeiD, Mahmut TöriD
Abstract
Downy mildew (DM) is a destructive disease that significantly reduces the yield and quality of important pulses (legumes) and horticultural crops, particularly during humid and cool seasons. This disease is caused by obligate and host-specific oomycete pathogens. Controlling the pathogen is challenging due to its long-term survival as spores and its rapid mutation. Use of chemical pesticides has been the most effective method to control DM pathogens, but their environmental hazards are a global concern. Current research is focused on exploring the potential of microbial biological control agents (MBCA), particularly rhizobacteria strains of the genera Bacillus and Pseudomonas, which have shown suppression of plant pathogens. However, to date, no MBCA has been reported to be effective against DM pathogens in pulses. We investigated the effectiveness of Bacillus and Pseudomonas strains as potential biopesticides against the pea downy mildew pathogen Peronospora viciae f. sp. pisi (Pvp). In our study, in vitro bioassays showed 100% inhibition of Pvp spore germination compared to the control. In planta antagonism assays further demonstrated significant suppression (>80%) of Pvp sporulation in pea plants sprayed with strains of Bacillus velezensis or P. fluorescens or their filtrates. The drench application also showed significant effects where either a Pseudomonas or cold-adapted Bacillus strain was used. We observed a synergistic effect for the dual foliar application of the microbes compared to individual application (27.6 to 46.7% suppression). Furthermore, the results from the molecular biomass analysis were consistent with the results of the sporulation assays. This demonstrates the strong interactive and promotive benefits of using Bacillus and Pseudomonas as biocontrol agents Based on these results, we conclude that these MBCAs could be effective in combatting Pvp infections in the field.
- Citations
- 2
- FWCI
- 1.07
- Field percentile
- top 21%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Rhizoxin and 2,4-diacetylphloroglucinol Contribute to Biocontrol of Pseudomonas protegens Pf-5 Against Pea Ascochyta Blight Pathogen Didymella pinodes
Jepri Agung Priyanto, Chiseche Mwanza, … Qing Yan·Microbiology SpectrumPeer-reviewed·Aug 11, 2026
- Soil-derived Bacillus pumilus strains demonstrate antagonistic activity against Magnaporthe oryzae and multiple plant growth-promoting traits
Lainey E Kemmerer, Timothy R. Johnson, … Jessie Fernandez·International Journal of Molecular SciencesPeer-reviewed·Aug 12, 2026
- Bacillus subtilis strain UD1022 as a biocontrol agent against Magnaporthe oryzae, the rice blast pathogen
Timothy Johnson, Lainey E Kemmerer, … Jessie Fernandez·Microbiology SpectrumPeer-reviewed·Sep 22, 2025
- Stress-adapted endophytic Pseudomonas strains isolated from unmanaged lupin promote potato growth and suppress verticillium wilt through complementary biocontrol and plant growth-promoting mechanisms
Numan Ibne Asad, Lia Watson, … Donald L. Smith·bioRxiv·Nov 9, 2026
- Insights into the Biocontrol Mechanisms of a Paenibacilluspeoriae Strain on Maize Seedling Blight through Multi-Omics Analysis
Yue Hu, Yifan Chen, … BeiBei Lü·bioRxiv·Apr 8, 2025
- Evaluating the Biocontrol Potential of Pythium oligandrum and Serratia proteamaculans in Controlling Phytophthora plurivora in European beech (Fagus sylvatica)
Bekele Gelena Kelbessa, Anton Samuelsson, … Ramesh Raju Vetukuri·bioRxiv·Oct 17, 2024