bioRxivEvolutionary Biology
Conflicting effects of recombination on the evolvability and robustness in neutrally evolving populations
Abstract
Understanding the benefits and costs of recombination under different scenarios of evolutionary adaptation remains an open problem for theoretical and experimental research. In this study, we focus on finite populations evolving on neutral networks comprising viable and unfit genotypes. We provide a comprehensive overview of the effects of recombination by jointly considering different measures of evolvability and mutational robustness over a broad parameter range, such that many evolutionary regimes are covered. We find that several of these measures vary non-monotonically with the rates of mutation and recombination. Moreover, the presence of unfit genotypes that introduce inhomogeneities in the network of viable states qualitatively alters the effects of recombination. We conclude that conflicting trends induced by recombination can be explained by an emerging trade-off between evolvability on the one hand, and mutational robustness on the other. Finally, we discuss how different implementations of the recombination scheme in theoretical models can affect the observed dependence on recombination rate through a coupling between recombination and genetic drift. Author summaryMany genetic mechanisms have been invoked to explain the advantage of sex, but a coherent picture is still to emerge. Here we present a systematic theoretical and computational investigation of the effects of recombination in populations evolving on neutral fitness landscapes with unfit genotypes. We focus on populations that are large enough to be polymorphic, but nevertheless strongly affected by drift, which causes them to diffuse across the neutral network of viable genotypes. We identify a novel trade-off between evolvability, robustness and fitness that can lead to a dramatic reduction of the genetic diversity at large recombination rates. This disproves the common notion (often referred to as Weismanns hypothesis) that recombination generally increases diversity and evolvability, and instead highlights the interplay of recombination and mutational robustness.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Recombination and mutational robustness in neutral fitness landscapes
A. Klug, S.-C. Park, J. Krug·bioRxiv·Feb 20, 2019
- Robustness Revisited: On the Neutral Evolution of Centrality and Localization
Yehonatan Sella, Aviv Bergman·Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesPeer-reviewed·May 29, 2025
- Elevated mutation near crossovers inhibits the evolution of recombination
Bret A. Payseur, Sarah Perin Otto·Evolution LettersPeer-reviewed·Jul 24, 2026
- Natural selection promotes the evolution of recombination 2: during the process of natural selection
P. J. Gerrish, F. Cordero, … N. W. Hengartner·bioRxiv·Jun 7, 2021
- Who are my Neighbours? Selection Targets Robustness to Full Replication Events, Not to Individual Mutations
Juliette Luiselli, Guillaume Beslon, Pieter van den Berg·GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Sep 25, 2026
- Genetic drift promotes and recombination hinders speciation on holey fitness landscapes
A. Kalirad, C. L. Burch, R. B. R. Azevedo·bioRxiv·Sep 20, 2022