bioRxivNeurosciencePreprint
Distinct Implicit Contributions to Action Selection and Action Execution in Sensorimotor Adaptation
Tianhe WangiD, Tony Lam, Jordan A. TayloriD, Richard B. IvryiD
Abstract
The sensorimotor system is continuously adjusted to minimize error. Current theories assume that this adaptation process entails the operation of multiple learning systems, with a key division between implicit and explicit components. Recent studies have revealed several inconsistencies regarding the characteristics and constraints of the implicit system, suggesting that the current framework is incomplete. Here, we propose that these conflicting findings can be understood by recognizing that there are multiple implicit subcomponents, distinguished by their distinct computational goals. One well-studied component is implicit recalibration, a process critical for action execution which uses sensory-prediction errors to automatically refine the sensorimotor map. Here we describe a second, novel component, implicit aiming, a process which contributes to action selection to achieve the specific goals. Through a series of studies, we find compelling evidence that those two implicit processes show a clear separation in their temporal stabilities and contextual modulations. These distinct properties correspond to different computational frameworks attributing learning dynamics to either contextual inference or cancellation of competing neural populations, respectively. Together, these findings suggest an alternative framework for sensorimotor adaptation based on the computational goals of the system rather than phenomenology.
- Citations
- 1
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Competition between parallel sensorimotor learning systems
Scott T. Albert, Jihoon Jang, … Reza Shadmehr·eLifePeer-reviewed·Feb 28, 2022
- Implicit visuomotor adaptation remains limited after several days of training
Sarah A. Hutter, Jordan A. Taylor·eNeuroPeer-reviewed·Jul 1, 2021
- The influence of task outcome on implicit motor learning
Hyosub E. Kim, Darius E. Parvin, Richard B. Ivry·eLifePeer-reviewed·Apr 29, 2019
- Interactions between sensory prediction error and task error during implicit motor learning
Jonathan Sanching Tsay, Adrian Mark Haith, … Hyosub E. Kim·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Mar 23, 2022
- Revisiting the explicit-implicit additivity assumption in visuomotor adaptation
Y P Chen, Jordan A. Taylor·Journal of NeurophysiologyPeer-reviewed·Apr 21, 2026
- Sensory prediction error drives subconscious motor learning outside of the laboratory
Scott T. Albert, Emily M. Blaum, Daniel H. Blustein·Journal of NeurophysiologyPeer-reviewed·Jul 12, 2023