Compression-Assisted Arthrocentesis of the Knee as a Quality Improvement Intervention
James F. Bennett, Wilmer L. Sibbitt, Philip A. Band, Sabeen Yaqub, N. Suzanne Emil, Monthida Fangtham, Roderick A. Fields, William A. Hayward, Selma D. Kettwich, Arthur D. Bankhurst
Abstract
ObjectiveThe present study reports the introduction of mechanical compression of the knee for arthrocentesis as quality improvement intervention in a procedure clinic.\n\nMethods430 consecutive symptomatic osteoarthritic knees underwent arthrocentesis followed by corticosteroid injection (1mg/kg of triamcinolone acetonide). The first 215 consecutive knees underwent conventional arthrocentesis and injection; the quality intervention of a mechanical compression brace was introduced, and the next 215 consecutive knees underwent mechanical compression-assisted arthrocentesis follow by injection. Pain scores, arthrocentesis success, fluid yield, time-to-next-intervention, injections/year, and medical costs were measured.\n\nResultsNo serious adverse events occurred in 430 subjects. Diagnostic synovial fluid ([≥]2 ml) was obtained in 9.3% (20/215) without compression and 40.9% (88/215) with compression (p=0.00001, z for 95% CI= 1.96, Pierson). Mechanical compression was associated with a 231% increase in mean arthrocentesis volume: compression 5.3{+/-}11.2 ml, conventional 1.6{+/-}6.4 ml (CI of difference 2.0 <3.7< 5.4; p=0.00001). Time-to-next-intervention after compression-assisted arthrocentesis was longer: 6.9{+/-}3.5 months compared to conventional: 5.1{+/-}2.7 months (p<0.00001, 95% CI of difference 1.2 <1.8< 2.3). Mechanical compression was associated with a reduction in the number of corticosteroid injections administered per year: mechanical compression: 1.7{+/-}0.9 injections/year; conventional: 2.4{+/-}0.5 injections/year (p<0.00001, 95% CI of difference -0.83 < -0.70< -0.56). Mechanical compression did not increase overall yearly costs associated with management of the symptomatic knee (mechanical compression: $293.30/year/knee, conventional: $373.29/year/knee) (p<0.0001, 95% CI of difference 47 <80< 112).\n\nConclusionsRoutine mechanical compression of the knee for arthrocentesis and injection is an effective bioengineering quality improvement intervention in a procedure clinic.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Organism
- Assay
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Improvement of arthroscopic surgical performance using a new wide-angle arthroscope
J.-M. Kwak, E. Kholinne, … I.-H. Jeon·bioRxiv·Aug 24, 2018
- Multi-frame biomechanical and relaxometry analysis during in vivo loading of the human knee by spiral dualMRI and compressed sensing
W. Lee, E. Miller, … C. P. Neu·Magnetic Resonance in MedicinePeer-reviewed·May 22, 2023
- Knee Biomechanics during Walking in Individuals with Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair: The Role of a Custom 3D Printed Knee Brace
Florian Mougin, Mickaël Begon, … Yosra Cherni·Prosthetics and Orthotics InternationalPeer-reviewed·May 9, 2025
- Micromechanical characterisation of osteoarthritic subchondral bone by micropillar compression
Samuel McPhee, Marta Peña Fernández, … Uwe Wolfram·Acta BiomaterialiaPeer-reviewed·May 20, 2026
- Can static optimization detect changes in peak medial knee contact forces induced by gait modifications?
J. M. Kaneda, K. A. Seagers, … S. L. Delp·bioRxiv·Jul 18, 2022
- Radiographic and clinical risk factors of total knee arthroplasty in asymptomatic knees; a 15-year follow-up study
F. K. Nielsen, A. G. Jurik, … N. Egund·bioRxiv·Oct 23, 2019