Dynamic configuration of large-scale cortical networks during an inhibitory task accounts for heterogeneity in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder traits
Jonah KemberiD, Carolynn HareiD, Ayda Tekok-KılıçiD, William Marshall, Stephen M. EmrichiD, Sidney J. SegalowitziD, Erin J. Panda
Abstract
The heterogeneity of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) traits (inattention vs. hyperactivity/impulsivity) complicates diagnosis and intervention. Identifying how the configuration of large-scale functional brain networks during cognitive processing correlate with this heterogeneity could help us understand the neural mechanisms altered across ADHD presentations. Here, we recorded high-density EEG while 62 non-clinical participants (ages 18-24; 32 male) underwent an inhibitory control task (Go/No-Go). Functional EEG networks were created using sensors as nodes and across-trial phase-lag index values as edges. Using cross-validated LASSO regression, we examined whether graph-theory metrics applied to both static networks (averaged across time-windows: -500-0ms, 0-500ms) and dynamic networks (temporally layered with 2ms intervals), were associated with hyperactive/impulsive and inattentive traits. Network configuration during response execution/inhibition was associated with hyperactive/impulsive (mean R2 across test sets = .20, SE = .02), but not inattentive traits. Post-stimulus results at higher frequencies (Beta, 14-29Hz; Gamma, 30-90Hz) showed the strongest association with hyperactive/impulsive traits, and predominantly reflected less burst-like integration between modules in oscillatory beta networks during execution, and increased integration/small-worldness in oscillatory gamma networks during inhibition. We interpret the beta network results as reflecting weaker integration between specialized pre-frontal and motor systems during motor response preparation, and the gamma results as reflecting a compensatory mechanism used to integrate processing between less functionally specialized networks. This research demonstrates that the neural network mechanisms underlying response execution/inhibition might be associated with hyperactive/impulsive traits, and that dynamic, task-related changes in EEG functional networks may be useful in disentangling ADHD heterogeneity.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 1
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Resting-state EEG dynamics help explain differences in response control in ADHD: Insight into electrophysiological mechanisms and sex differences
Jonah Kember, Lauren Stepien, … Ayda Tekok-Kılıç·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Oct 5, 2023
- Exploring Neural Heterogeneity in Inattention and Hyperactivity
Natalia Zdorovtsova, Jonathan Spencer Jones, … Duncan Edward Astle·CortexPeer-reviewed·Apr 26, 2023
- Dynamic synergetic configurations of resting-state networks in ADHD.
Neda Kaboodvand, Behzad Iravani, Peter Fransson·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Nov 9, 2019
- Functional connectivity differences in adult's ADHD - a MEG study
Pedram Mouseli, Benjamin Thomas Dunkley, Massieh Moayedi·bioRxiv·Jul 9, 2025
- ADHD Symptoms are Associated with the Modular Structure of Intrinsic Brain Networks in a Representative Sample of Healthy Adults
Kirsten Hilger, Christian J. Fiebach·Network NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2019
- White matter properties in fronto-parietal tracts predict maladaptive functional activation and deficient response inhibition in ADHD
Daniel Smullen, Andrew P. Bagshaw, … Carmel Mevorach·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Jun 6, 2025