Simultaneous Modelling Of Movement, Measurement Error, And Observer Dependence In Double-Observer Distance Sampling Surveys
Abstract
Mark-recapture distance sampling uses detections, non-detections and recorded distances of animals encountered in transect surveys to estimate abundance. However, commonly available distance sampling estimators require that distances to target animals are made without error and that animals are stationary while sampling is being conducted. In practice these requirements are often violated. In this paper, we describe a marginal likelihood framework for estimating abundance from double-observer data that can accommodate movement and measurement error when observations are made consecutively (as with front and rear observers) and when animals are randomly distributed when detected by the first observer. Our framework requires that two observers independently detect and record binned distances to observed animal groups, as we well as a binary indicator for whether animals were moving or not. We then assume that stationary animals are subject to measurement error whereas moving animals are subject to both movement and measurement error. Integrating over unknown animal locations, we construct a marginal likelihood for detection, movement, and measurement error parameters. Estimates of animal abundance are then obtained using a modified Horvitz-Thompson-like estimator. In addition, unmodelled heterogeneity in detection probability can be accommodated through observer dependence parameters. Using simulation, we show that our approach yields low bias compared to approaches that ignore movement and/or measurement error, including in cases where there is considerable detection heterogeneity. We demonstrate our approach using data from a double-observer waterfowl helicopter survey.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Double-observer approach with camera traps: Towards an unbiased density estimation of unmarked animal populations
Y. Nakashima, S. Hongo, … Z. C. B. Dzefck·bioRxiv·Apr 9, 2021
- Avoiding biased estimates: measuring observer avoidance bias in distance sampling estimates of animal populations
DWE Sankey, CDA Blasi-Foglietti, … Sarah Papworth·bioRxiv·Sep 23, 2025
- Camera trap monitoring of unmarked animals: a map of the relationships between population size estimators
Clément Calenge·Peer Community JournalPeer-reviewed·May 11, 2026
- Estimating animal density in three dimensions using capture-frequency data from remote detectors
J. S. Vargas Soto, R. A. Castaneda, … P. K. Molnar·bioRxiv·Nov 23, 2019
- Simulation-based assessment of the performance of hierarchical abundance estimators for camera trap surveys
- Clarifying space use concepts in ecology: range vs. occurrence distributions
J. M. Alston, C. H. Fleming, … W. F. Fagan·EcologyPeer-reviewed·Mar 7, 2026