bioRxivGenomicsPreprint
Technical Note: Efficient and accurate estimation of genotype odds ratios in biobank-based unbalanced case-control studies
Abstract
In genome-wide association studies (GWASs), genotype log-odds ratios (LORs) quantify the effects of the variants on the binary phenotypes, and calculating the genotype LORs for all of the markers is required for several downstream analyses. Calculating genotype LORs at a genome-wide scale is computationally challenging, especially when analyzing large-scale biobank data, which involves performing thousands of GWASs phenome-wide. Since most of the binary phenotypes in biobank-based studies have unbalanced (case : control = 1 : 10) or often extremely unbalanced (case : control = 1 : 100) case-control ratios, the existing methods cannot provide a scalable and accurate way to estimate the genotype LORs. The traditional logistic regression provides biased LOR estimates in such situations. Although the Firth bias correction method can provide unbiased LOR estimates, it is not scalable for genome-wide or phenome-wide scale association analyses typically used in biobank-based studies, especially when the number of non-genetic covariates is large. On the other hand, the saddlepoint approximation-based test (fastSPA), which can provide accurate p values and is scalable to analyse large-scale biobank data, does not provide the genotype LOR estimates as it is a score-based test. Here, we propose a scalable method based on score statistics, to accurately estimate the genotype LORs, adjusting for non-genetic covariates. Comparing to the Firth method, our proposed method reduces the computational complexity from O(nK2 + K3) to O(n), where n is the sample-size, and K is the number of non-genetic covariates. Our method is ~ 10x faster than the Firth method when 15 covariates are being adjusted for. Through extensive numerical simulations, we show that the proposed method is both scalable and accurate in estimating the genotype ORs in genome-wide or phenome-wide scale.
- assay: GWAS summary statistics
- research focus: variant effect prediction
- research focus: benchmarking
- research focus: variant calling
- approach: statistical model
- approach: matrix factorization
- Citations
- 3
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Efficiently controlling for case-control imbalance and sample relatedness in large-scale genetic association studies
Wei Zhou, Jonas Bille Nielsen, … Seunggeun Lee·Nature GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Aug 8, 2018
- Fast estimation of genetic correlation for Biobank-scale data
Yue Wu, Kathryn S. Burch, … Sriram Sankararaman·The American Journal of Human GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Dec 2, 2021
- Efficient mixed model approach for large-scale genome-wide association studies of ordinal categorical phenotypes
Wenjian Bi, Wei Zhou, … Seunggeun Lee·The American Journal of Human GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Apr 8, 2021
- Scalable Bias-corrected Linkage Disequilibrium Estimation Under Genotype Uncertainty
David Gerard·HeredityPeer-reviewed·Aug 9, 2021
- Quantifying polygenic effects in genome-wide association studies using generalized estimating equations
Julian Hecker, Dmitry Prokopenko, … Heide Löhlein Fier·bioRxiv·Nov 25, 2015
- Penalized Logistic Regression Analysis for Genetic Association Studies of Binary Phenotypes
Ying Yu, Siyuan Chen, … Brad McNeney·Human HeredityPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2022