eLifeNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Somatodendritic orientation determines tDCS-induced neuromodulation of Purkinje cell activity in awake mice.
Carlos Andrés Sánchez-LeóniD, Guillermo Sánchez-Garrido CamposiD, Marta Cejudo FernándeziD, Álvaro Sánchez‐LópeziD, Javier F. MedinaiD, Javier Márquez‐RuiziD
Abstract
Transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS) of the cerebellum is a promising non-invasive neuromodulatory technique being proposed for the treatment of neurological and neuropsychiatric disorders. However, there is a lack of knowledge about how externally applied currents affect neuronal spiking activity in cerebellar circuits in vivo. We investigated how Cb-tDCS affects the firing rate of Purkinje cells (PC) and non-PC in the mouse cerebellar cortex to understand the underlying mechanisms behind the polarity-dependent modulation of neuronal activity induced by tDCS. Mice (n = 9) were prepared for the chronic recording of LFPs to assess the actual electric field gradient imposed by Cb-tDCS in our experimental design. Single-neuron extracellular recording of PCs in awake (n = 24) and anesthetized (n = 27) mice was combined with juxtacellular recordings and subsequent staining of PC with neurobiotin under anesthesia (n = 8) to correlate their neuronal orientation with their response to Cb-tDCS. Finally, a high-density Neuropixels recording system was used to demonstrate the relevance of neuronal orientation during the application of Cb-tDCS in awake mice (n = 6). In this study, we observe that Cb-tDCS induces a heterogeneous polarity-dependent modulation of the firing rate of Purkinje cells (PC) and non-PC in the mouse cerebellar cortex. We demonstrate that the apparently heterogeneous effects of tDCS on PC activity can be explained by taking into account the somatodendritic orientation relative to the electric field. Our findings highlight the need to consider neuronal orientation and morphology to improve tDCS computational models, enhance stimulation protocol reliability, and optimize effects in both basic and clinical applications.
- Citations
- 16
- FWCI
- 4.35
- Field percentile
- top 6%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Cortical network mechanisms of anodal and cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation in awake primates
Andrew R. Bogaard, Guillaume Lajoie, … Eberhard E. Fetz·bioRxiv·Jul 8, 2019
- tDCS changes in motor excitability are specific to orientation of current flow
Vishal Rawji, Matteo Ciocca, … Sven Bestmann·Brain stimulationPeer-reviewed·Nov 7, 2017
- Polarity-dependent modulation of sensory circuits by cerebellar tDCS: local and distant effects
Carlos Andrés Sánchez-León, Isabel Cordones, … Javier Márquez‐Ruiz·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Jul 9, 2026
- An in vivo model for transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor cortex in awake mice.
Carlos Andrés Sánchez-León, Pablo Alejandro Reyes-Velásquez, … Michael Andreas Nitsche·Brain stimulationPeer-reviewed·Oct 25, 2025
- Multi-scale model of axonal and dendritic polarization by transcranial direct current stimulation in realistic head geometry
A. S. Aberra, R. Wang, … A. V. Peterchev·bioRxiv·Aug 23, 2023
- Investigation of neuromodulatory effect of anodal cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation on the primary motor cortex using functional near-infrared spectroscopy
Zeshan Shoaib, Won Kee Chang, … Won‐Seok Kim·The CerebellumPeer-reviewed·Jan 12, 2023